Accuracy of color conversion profile

ABSTRACT

A method for determining lattice points to be referenced to prepare the correspondence defining data, said method including steps of prescribing a smoothness evaluation function which evaluates smoothness of arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color space and contains a constraint condition that the arrangement of lattice points becomes nonuniform at a certain position in the device-independent color space and which has as a variable the lattice point position information in the low-dimensional color space which is prescribed by less color components than the number of inks used by the printing apparatus, optimizing the arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color space by improving the rating of the smoothness evaluation function, with the lattice point position information in the low-dimensional color space varied, and determining lattice points to be referenced to prepare the correspondence defining data in the optimized state.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a technique for improving the accuracy of color conversion profile used for printing.

2. Description of the Related Art

The image output devices such as displays and printers usually employ the color image data which expresses in tone the color of each pixel in term of specific color components. The image data specify colors by means of any of color spaces, such as RGB color space that uses three colors of R (red), G (green), and B (blue), and CMY color space that uses C (cyan), M (magenta), and Y (yellow), including lc (light cyan), lm (light magenta), DY (dark yellow), and K (black). These colors are usually device-dependent colors inherent in individual image output devices. One way to permit various image output devices to produce identical colors is by using a color-correcting LUT (look-up table) that specifies correspondence between colors for one device and colors for another device.

The color-correcting LUT should specify the correspondence for all the colors that can be produced by any image output device; however, this is impractical from the stand-point of memory capacity and work require to prepare each color-correcting LUT. It is common practice to specify the correspondence for typical colors in a specific number and calculate the correspondence for any other arbitrary colors by interpolation. In other words, common practice is not to perform colorimetry on a very large number of colors but to cause the image output device to produce colors (to an extent for practical colorimetry) and perform colorimetry on these colors, thereby specifying the color-correcting LUT for typical colors in a specific number.

Before preparing the color-correcting LUT, it is necessary to determine the colors in a specific number on which colorimetry is performed or to determine a plurality of lattice points in the color space. One conventional way to determine lattice points is by color separation. The procedure for color separation consists of prescribing cubic lattice points in the CMY space and transforming three colors of CMY at each lattice point into six colors of CMYKlclm according to a special transforming rule, thereby determining lattice points with components of ink colors.

The above-mentioned conventional method for determining lattice points is unable to sufficiently improve the accuracy of color conversion in the color-correcting LUT to be prepared eventually. In other words, the correspondence between CMY and ink color components, which is determined by color separation as mentioned above, conforms to the rule of transformation; however, the arrangement of lattice points may be distorted after color separation because no consideration is given to the smoothness of the arrangement of lattice points in the color space. If color transformation is carried out by referencing the distorted arrangement of lattice points, there occur some portions with locally poor accuracy at the time of interpolation. Particularly, this is an instance where sufficient smoothing is not achieved when R ink or V (violet) ink is used. Consequently, there has been a demand for a technique to select as many lattice points as possible and optimize them to minimize distortion in the arrangement of lattice points while satisfying the rule of color separation. In addition, there is an instance where the density of lattice points in the color space should desirably be higher in one region than another (for high color conversion accuracy) or varies from one region to another according to ink characteristics. In this case, however, it was impossible to consider the local arrangement of lattice points if the arrangement of lattice points is smoothed throughout the entire color space.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention was completed in view of the foregoing. It is an object of the present invention to provide a procedure for selecting optimal lattice points by adjusting the arrangement of lattice points highly freely and also controlling local variation in the arrangement of lattice points.

According to the present invention, the above-mentioned object is achieved by prescribing a function to evaluate smoothness of the arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color space (said function containing a constraint condition that the arrangement of lattice points is nonuniform at a specific position in the device-independent color space and also having as a variable the position information of lattice points in the low-dimensional color space) and by improving the rating by the evaluation function, thereby optimizing the arrangement of lattice points. In other words, the object for which the arrangement of lattice points is smoothed is the device-independent color space, and the variable is the position information of lattice points in the low-dimensional color space. Therefore, when the arrangement of lattice points is smoothed for optimization, the amount of ink defined by the original correspondence defining data is not varied directly. In other words, the procedure calculates the amount of ink corresponding to the lattice points specified by the lattice point position information after the lattice point position information has been updated and then associates it with the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space prescribed by the original correspondence defining data; however, the procedure does not change directly the amount of ink per se prescribed by the original correspondence defining data when the amount of ink is calculated.

On the other hand, since the evaluation function is under the constraint condition that the arrangement of lattice points is nonuniform at a specific position in the device-independent color space, the arrangement of lattice points is not even but nonuniform at the specific position when the ranting of the evaluation function is improved. Therefore it is possible to control the arrangement of lattice points as desired by raising the density of lattice points at a specific position or by changing the density of lattice points with a gradient in the color space. Of course, it is not essential that the constraint condition should be imposed at every position in the color space; the condition may be imposed at a specific position. At a position where the constraint condition is not imposed, the arrangement of lattice points may be optimized so that the arrangement of lattice points is made even and smooth.

Therefore, the foregoing makes it possible to change highly freely the lattice point position information of the low-dimensional color space and the lattice point in the device-independent color space without being greatly affected by the rule of color separation when the lattice point position information in the low-dimensional color space is updated and the lattice point in the device-independent color space is moved. It is also possible to make the arrangement of lattice points nonuniform at a specific position in the color space when it is not desirable to evenly smooth the color space as a whole. Incidentally, when the arrangement of lattice points is smoothed, the amount of ink specified by the original correspondence defining data is not varied directly; however, consideration is given substantially to the rule of color separation when the arrangement of lattice points is smoothed. In other words, the above-mentioned color separation associates the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space, which are prescribed with less color components than the number of inks for each color, with the lattice points for ink amount in the ink amount space, whose components are the amount of ink for each color. This correspondence is the original correspondence defining data.

When the smoothness evaluating function is determined, the correspondence between the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space and the lattice points in the device-independent color space is acquired by referencing the original correspondence defining data. This makes it possible to determine the smoothness evaluation function to evaluate smoothness of the arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color space, with its variable being the lattice point position information of the low-dimensional color space. Therefore, the smoothness evaluation function does not vary the amount of ink but reflects the correspondence prescribed by the original correspondence defining data. Therefore, by improving the rating by the smoothness evaluation function, it is possible to satisfy at the same time the smoothing of the arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color space and the control of the local arrangement of lattice points as well as the conformation to the rule of color separation.

The correspondence defining data may be any data that define correspondence between the printing apparatus and the color component value in a color system; for example, it may be an LUT or a so-called profile containing the matrix that prescribes the color relations. The color system mentioned above may be the Lab color space or XYZ color space, which are device independent. (In this specification, the symbol Lab is used for brevity in place of the conventional symbol L*a*b.) It may also include the color space formed by RGB values (used for display) or CMY values. The printing apparatus according to the present invention can use more than three color inks, such as four inks of CMYK or six inks of CMYKlclm or more. The ink combination is not limited to them; a combination of six color inks of CMYKRV is acceptable.

On the other hand, it is only necessary for the original correspondence defining data to prescribe correspondence between the lattice points in a low-dimensional color space that prescribe colors with less color components than the number of inks for each color used by the printing apparatus and the ink amount lattice points in the ink amount space whose components are the amount of inks of each color. The low-dimensional color space may be the RGB color space or the CMY color space, for example. Here, the original correspondence defining data does not need to strictly prescribe correspondence for colors prescribed by each lattice point; therefore, this makes it possible to consider freely the rule of color separation when the original correspondence defining data is previously prepared.

RGB colors and CMY colors are complementary to each other; therefore, when each color is expressed in 256 tones (from 0 to 255), it is possible to assume that C=255−R, M=255−G, and Y=255−B unless a strict agreement among colors is taken into account. Consequently, the RGB color space as the low-dimensional color space is substantially equivalent to the CMY color space as the low-dimensional color space. It is possible to accept various rules to be considered when the original correspondence defining data is previously prepared. One rule may govern how to allocate the combination of CMY colors to CMYKlclm inks at a certain ratio, another rule may limit the amount of inks to be sprayed onto the printing paper, or further another rule may limit the use of K ink to prevent the occurrence of granularity.

The smoothness evaluation function may be acceptable so long as it is capable of evaluating smoothness of the arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color space and it is also capable of imposing the constraint condition that the arrangement of lattice points becomes nonuniform at a specific position in the device-independent color space. Here, smoothness of arrangement implies the degree to which the line of lattice points is distorted in the color space. For example, distortion is null if the lattice points in the device-independent color space are arranged in cubic lattice, but it is large if lattice points are dislocated from the position of cubic lattice points. It can be said that the degree of smoothness is high if lattice points are arranged uniformly in the device-independent color space. It can also be said that the degree of smoothness is low if a curve is described by a high-order function, said curve being drawn between neighboring lattice points in the device-independent color space and from one boundary to the other in the color gamut formed in the device-independent color space.

In general, if lattice points are regularly arranged in the color space, it is possible to carry out interpolation without appreciable variation in accuracy regardless of local positions in the space when the color at that position is calculated by interpolation. Therefore, by optimizing the position of lattice points according to the present invention, it is possible to improve accuracy of interpolation which is carried out when the correspondence defining data is prepared. In other words, according to the present invention, it is possible to easily determine the lattice points to be referenced to prepare the correspondence defining data on which highly accurate interpolation can be performed.

The smoothness evaluation function should be able to indicate smoothness of the arrangement of lattice points by its value. Making the value to approach an ideal value improves the rating. For example, if the function behaves such that its value decreases as smoothness of the arrangement of lattice points increases, it is possible to optimize the arrangement of lattice points by searching the lattice point position information in the low-dimensional color space that permits the function to takes on a minimal value. This searching may be accomplished in various ways. For example, it is possible to accept various algorithms such as quasi-Newton method and conjugate gradient method.

Moreover, for the constraint condition that the arrangement of lattice points becomes nonuniform, it is not ideal to make completely even the arrangement of lattice points in the color gamut; however, it is only necessary to permit the state in which lattice points are dense or lattice point intervals are nonuniform at a specific part. Thus several conditions are permissible. For example, in the case where the arrangement of lattice points is optimized by minimizing the evaluation function as mentioned above, it is permissible to specify the evaluation function such that its value becomes smaller as lattice points approach the specific nonuniform arrangement at a specific position where the arrangement of lattice points is made nonuniform.

It is only necessary to be able to acquire from the original correspondence defining data the correspondence between lattice points in the low-dimensional color space and lattice points in the device-independent color space. It is possible to acquire by various methods the correspondence between the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space (specified by the original correspondence defining data) and the ink amount lattice points. For example, it is possible to acquire the color component values corresponding to lattice points in the device-independent color space by carrying out printing with the amount of ink for each color indicated by ink amount lattice points corresponding to lattice points in the low-dimensional color space and then performing colorimetry on the results of printing.

Also, the original correspondence defining data does not strictly prescribe correspondence between actual colors and it is troublesome to perform printing and colorimetry for all the lattice points of the low-dimensional color space (usually about 1000 points) prescribed by the original correspondence defining data. Therefore, it is permissible to perform operation in a simple manner by using an approximation formula. The approximation formula may be one which is based on physical foundation, and it prescribes correspondence between the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space and the lattice points in the device-independent color space, because the present invention is intended to smooth the arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color space. The procedure is carried out such that if the lattice points in the device-independent color space obtained by the approximation formula are smoothed, then the actual lattices points are also sufficiently smoothed.

The use of the approximation formula may be exemplified by the combination of colorimetry (to be performed only 16 times or so for each ink in this invention) and operation. To be more specific, patches are printed with each ink in single color in order to reduce the number of colors to be measured, and colorimetry is performed on such patches. The resulting colorimetric values are referenced to calculate the color component value of the device-independent color space by approximation. The approximation formula may be an equality which converts the measured value of ink density into the value of RGB brightness components. This operation gives the correspondence between the amount of ink for each color used for patch printing and the RGB brightness.

In this state a correspondence is established between the amount of ink for each color and the RGB brightness; therefore, it is possible to calculate the RGB brightness corresponding to the combination of individual inks. For example, it is possible to calculate the RGB brightness for the combination of arbitrary ink amounts by the above-mentioned correspondence, if it is assumed that the RGB brightness for the combination of individual inks is one which is obtained by multiplying the RGB brightness for individual inks by each RGB component,

Therefore, interpolation in this stage permits conversion from the combination of ink amounts (prescribed by the original correspondence defining data) into the values of components of RGB brightness. The values of components of RGB brightness can be converted approximately into lattice points in the device-independent color space by the matrix operation (such as any known formula to convert sRGB values into Lab values). In this way the combination of ink amounts (prescribed by the original correspondence defining data) is associated with lattice points in the device-independent color space. This eventually implies that lattice points in the low-dimensional color space are associated with lattice points in the device-independent color space. That is, by referencing the original correspondence defining data once when the evaluation function is prescribed, it is possible to prepare the smoothness evaluation function having as a variable the lattice point position information in the low-dimensional color space, while adding the rule of color separation which is taken into account when the original correspondence defining data is prepared.

The smoothness evaluation function should be one which evaluates smoothness of the arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color space, contains a constraint condition that the arrangement of lattice points becomes nonuniform at a certain position in the device-independent color space, and has as a variable the lattice point position information of the low-dimensional color space. However, the function may not be common to all the lattice points to be optimized. For example, the function may have a form which changes from one position to another in the color gamut to which the lattice point to be optimized belongs. In other words, the lattice point to be optimized may or may not be moved freely depending on its position; therefore, the smoothness evaluation function may have a form which varies depending on the position of the lattice point to be optimized. Thus, the smoothness evaluation function can move the lattice point in the most adequate state for individual positions. Here, the lattice point position information may be one which specifies the position of lattice points in the low-dimensional color space, and it may take on various forms. For example, it may be one in which lattice points in the low-dimensional color space are sequentially numbered from those having a small color value and the value of color component between the original lattice points is specified when the number is smaller than a decimal point. Of course, it is also possible to accept one which specifies the position of lattice points by means of RGB data.

There are several methods for evaluating smoothness. A simple method is by using a function which contains the absolute value of the sum of the vectors which are oriented toward the lattice point adjacent to the lattice point to be optimized and which are also oriented in approximately mutually opposite directions. In other words, the sum of the vectors which are directed toward the adjoining lattice point and in approximately mutually opposite directions takes on a value “0” when both vectors have the same magnitude and are oriented in the exactly opposite directions and the sum of terms multiplied by different weighting factors for the respective vectors takes on a value of “0” when both vectors have the same magnitude and are oriented in the opposite directions.

Therefore, if the smoothness evaluation function is the function that contains the absolute value of the sum of the former, then by minimizing its value, it is possible to bring the lattice point to be optimized close uniformly to their neighboring lattice points and to bring the lattice point to be optimized close to the straight line connecting the neighboring lattice points. In the case of the function containing the absolute value of the sum of the latter, it is possible to make nonuniform the distance between the lattice point to be optimized and its neighboring lattice point or it is possible to bring the lattice point to be optimized close to the straight line connecting neighboring lattice points, by minimizing its value. In this case, the evaluation function may be one which contains the absolute value of the sum of terms multiplied by the above-mentioned weighting factor only at a specific position in the device-independent color space and which contains the absolute value of the sum of vectors without multiplication by the weighting factors at other positions. Then it is possible to make locally nonuniform the arrangement of lattice points, while keeping high the degree of smoothness of arrangement in principle for these lattice points by performing optimization on the lattice points to be optimized.

Of course, the value of the weighting factor may vary form one region to another in the color gamut to which the lattice point to be optimized belongs. In other words, since smoothness or nonuniformness of lattice points varies from one region to another in the color gamut, it is possible to control the arrangement of lattice points in more detail by varying the value of the weighting factor for each region in the color gamut. It is also possible to control in such a way that the density of lattice points in the color gamut gradually varies as the value of the weighting factors gradually varies. Inks usually have the characteristic property that as the tone value of ink amount increases, the degree of change in density becomes small for the degree of change in the tone value. Consequently, if the density of lattice points corresponding to the small tone value of ink amount is made high, it is possible to perform accurate color conversion even in a region where the degree of change in density is large for the degree of change in the tone value of ink amount.

Moreover, it is possible to adopt various values for the value of the weighting factor. For example, if one vector is larger than the other, the weighting factor to be applied to the first vector may be smaller than the factor to be applied to second vector. In other words, if there is a difference in the magnitude of vectors directed from the lattice point to be optimized to the neighboring lattice points before the function is minimized, the larger vectors give a greater contribution to the evaluation function and hence the lattice point to be optimized is easy to move so that the large vector is made small. Therefore, when the evaluation function is minimized, it is greatly affected by specific neighboring lattice points. So, it is possible to adjust the degree of influence from the neighboring lattice points by multiplying the weighting factors having a smaller value for larger vectors. Of course, as the consequence of this, it is possible to make nonuniform the arrangement of lattices point to be optimized.

Moreover, as an example of the weighting factor, it is possible to adopt the one in which the weighting factor to be multiplied to each vector in the opposite direction is inversely proportional to the distance between the low-dimensional color lattice points corresponding to end points of each vector. In other words, by considering the distance between the low-dimensional color lattice points in the low-dimensional color space, when the low-dimensional color lattice points corresponding to the lattice point to be optimized and its neighboring lattice points are nonuniformly arranged before the evaluation function is minimized, it is possible to nonuniformly arrange the lattice points in the device-independent color space by reflecting the degree of the nonuniformness. The low-dimensional color space has a small number of dimensions and permits the arrangement of lattice points to be determined easily in advance; therefore, it is possible to easily control the density of lattice points after optimization by previously determining the arrangement of lattice points in the low-dimensional color space.

If the lattice points present on the boundary of the color gamut are allowed to move freely when the lattice point to be optimized are optimized, then the lattice points move toward the outside or inside the color gamut. If the lattice point move toward the outside of the color gamut, it is meaningless because that color cannot be output. (Such a lattice point is brought back into the color gamut by gamut mapping mentioned later.) If the lattice point is moved toward the inside of the color gamut, the result is that the range of colors that can originally be expressed by the printing apparatus is narrowed and the ability to express tones by printing is deteriorated. So, it is possible to adopt the function form which varies for each region in the color gamut to which the lattice point to be optimized belongs. This function form is such that when the lattice point to be optimized belongs to the edge line on the boundary of the color gamut, the neighboring lattice points are the lattice points which exist on said edge line and at the opposite sides with respect to the lattice point to be optimized.

The advantage of the foregoing case is that the objects for comparison of smoothness are only the neighboring lattice points on the edge line, and hence the lattice point to be optimized for which the values of the smoothness evaluation function are to be effectively change may be moved in the direction of the edge line and it is easy to move the lattice point to be optimized along the edge line. Therefore, it is possible to easily maintain the size of the color gamut. Of course, it is possible to construct such that the lattice point to be optimized move only along the edge line. That is, in the color system, such as RGB and CMY color systems, which expresses the brightness and density of each color by color component values, at least one of the component values of each color takes on the minimum value or maximum value at the boundary of the color gamut. Therefore, on the edge line of the boundary of the color gamut, two of the color component values take on minimum or maximum values and the other one is variable. Thus, the lattice points can be made to move on the edge line if a prescribed constraint condition is imposed on the lattice point position information as the variable of the smoothness evaluation function, with any one of the color component values left variable and the other color component value fixed.

In addition, the function form which varies for each region in the color gamut to which the lattice point to be optimized belongs may be such that when the lattice point to be optimized belongs to the outer place on the boundary of the color gamut, the adjoining lattice points are the lattice points which exist on the outer plane and also exist at the mutually opposite sides with respect to the lattice point to be optimized. In this case, the objects for comparison of smoothness are only the neighboring lattice points on the outer plane, and hence the lattice point to be optimized for which the values of the smoothness evaluation function are to be effectively varied may be moved along the outer plane and it is easy to move the lattice point to be optimized along the outer plane of the color gamut. Therefore, it is possible to easily maintain the size of the color gamut.

Incidentally, the neighboring lattice points are a set of two lattice points which exist at mutually opposite sides with respect to the lattice point to be optimized, and two sets of such neighboring lattice points (four in total) may be used. In such a case, the lattice point to be optimized may be moved along the outer plane of the color gamut. Of course, it is possible to adopt three sets of neighboring lattice points (six in total). Moreover, it is possible to arrange such that the lattice point to be optimized move only on the outer plane. That is, in the color system, such as RGB and CMY color systems, which expresses the brightness and density of each color by the color component value, at least one of the color component values takes on a minimum or maximum value on the outer plane of the boundary of the color gamut. Thus, the lattice points can be made to move on the outer plane if a prescribed constraint condition is imposed on the lattice point position information as the variable of the smoothness evaluation function, with any two of the color component values left variable and the other color component value fixed.

In addition, the function form which varies for each region in the color gamut to which the lattice point to be optimized belongs may be such that when the lattice point to be optimized belongs to the inside of the boundary of the color gamut, the adjoining lattice points are the lattice points which belong to the inside of the color gamut and also exist at the mutually opposite sides with respect to the lattice point to be optimized. In this case, the objects for comparison of smoothness are the neighboring lattice points which adjoin at the periphery to be optimized. The neighboring lattice points are a set of two lattice points which exist at mutually opposite sides with respect to the lattice point to be optimized, and three sets of such neighboring lattice points (six in total) may be used. In such a case, the lattice point to be optimized may be moved three dimensionally inside the color gamut. Of course, it is possible to adopt more than three sets (six in total) of neighboring lattice points. Incidentally, the lattice point to be optimized is one which is inside the color gamut (or one which exists inside the color gamut excluding the boundary of the color gamut). However, the lattice point on the boundary of the color gamut may be the neighboring lattice point so long as it belongs to the inside of the color gamut.

In the meantime, the above-mentioned method for determining lattice points to be referenced to prepare the correspondence defining data may be utilized to make lattice points to be referenced to prepare the correspondence defining data by means of a computer and other various apparatus. Therefore, the present invention may be practiced as an apparatus as well as a program product. Once determined by the present invention, the lattice points used for preparing the correspondence defining data make it possible to measure the colors output by a printer with the amount of ink specified by them, and the thus measured values make it possible to associate the amount of ink with the color used by other image apparatus (such as display). The processing apparatus that uses such LUTs and profiles is also within the scope of the present invention.

In other words, the present invention covers a print controlling apparatus, a print controlling method, and a print controlling program product, each using the correspondence defining data. Such an apparatus and method may be practiced individually or incorporated into a certain apparatus. The present invention may be practiced in various embodiments, including recording media storing software. The recording media include magnetic recording medium, magneto-optical recording media, or any kind of recording media which will be developed in the future. The software may be in the form of primary or secondary copy.

The software may be provided through communication lines. The present invention may be embodied partly in the form of software and partly in the form of hardware. The software may be stored partly in the storage device and read in according to need. The software may be used in combination with an external program product, so long as it makes the computer to realize the necessary functions.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating the steps for preparing the color-correcting LUT.

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating the smoothing procedure.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing the hardware configuration of the print controlling apparatus.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing the program to be executed by the print controlling apparatus.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the smoothing module.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart for the smoothing procedure.

FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram showing the color gamut of the printer.

FIG. 8 is a diagram showing the evaluation function that optimizes the lattice point on the edge line.

FIG. 9 is a diagram showing the evaluation function that optimizes the lattice point on the outer plane.

FIG. 10 is a diagram showing the evaluation function that optimizes the lattice point inside the color gamut.

FIG. 11 is a block diagram of a program which is executed in another embodiment.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described below in the following order.

(1) Preparation of color-correcting LUT and outline of smoothing.

(2) Print controlling apparatus.

(3) Smoothing process.

(4) Optimization by means of evaluation function.

-   -   (4-1) Evaluation function E₁:     -   (4-2) Evaluation function E₂:     -   (4-3) Evaluation function E₃:

(5) Another embodiment.

(1) Preparation of Color-correcting LUT and Outline of Smoothing.

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating the process of preparing the color-correcting LUT which is referenced when printing is executed by a printer. FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating the smoothing which is executed when the color-correcting LUT is prepared. These processes should preferably be carried out by using a computer because they involve a large amount of computation. Actual printing should preferably be carried out by a printer which uses the color-correcting LUT which has been prepared. In addition, the halftoning (HT) mentioned later should be carried out by the same algorithm for halftoning employed by the printer.

The color-correcting LUT in this embodiment is a table which defines the correspondence between sRGB data and CMYKlclm data for a plurality of reference points. If these referencing points are referenced for interpolation, it is possible to associate any color in sRGB data with any color in CMYKlclm data. In order to prepare this color-correcting LUT in this embodiment, it is necessary to previously prepare the color-separating LUT. The color-correcting LUT corresponds to “the correspondence defining data” as used in claim and the color-separating LUT corresponds to “the original correspondence defining data” as used in claim. In this embodiment, the color-separating LUT is one which is prepared by converting three-dimensional RGB data into six-dimensional CMYKlclm data in conformity with rules and associating the results; it defines the correspondence between RGB data and CMYKlclm data for a plurality of reference points.

In other words, one color that is expressed by a combination of six colors of CMYKlclm can be expressed by a combination of different CMYKlclm values, and it is troublesome to univocally determine the CMYKlclm data corresponding to a color represented by RGB data. Therefore, the LUT defines the correspondence between RGB data and CMYKlclm data on the assumption such correspondence conforms to a specific rule. Since the correspondence between RGB data and CMYKlclm data is established according to a specific rule, the color-separating LUT differs from the color-correcting LUT in that the color indicated by the RGB data at the reference point (to be used by the image apparatus) does not always agree with the color indicated by the CMYKlclm data.

Incidentally, the RGB data and CMYKlclm data employ the range of tone values which is identical with the range of tone values (usually from 0 to 255) which is used in various image apparatus. Also, since each RGB color is complementary to each CMYK color, it may be assumed that C=255−R, M=255−G, and Y=255−B if it is not necessary to strictly define any color by tone values. In this sense, the RGB data in the color-separating LUT may be the CMY data. The above-mentioned specific rule is not limited to only one. The rule provides, for example, that if RGB data is regarded as identical with CMY data, an equal amount a is subtracted from each tone value of CMYK and C=M=Y=a is replaced by the tone value b of K and the remainder of C and M is replaced by lc and lm in a certain ratio. In other words, this rule provides that each tone value of CMY is replaced by each tone value of CMYKlclm which is deemed equivalent.

In addition, since each tone value of CMYKlclm specifies the amount of each color ink to be used, it is determined by considering the condition of limiting inks to be used. This condition limits the amount of ink per unit area below a certain level and also limits the amount of specific inks in order to control ink deposition that affects granularity and appearance (which differs depending on light source). Moreover, the color gamut should be as wide as possible because the image quality is improved with the increasing number of the colors which can be expressed by combination of CMYKlclm inks.

These rules play a very important role at the time of printing to be executed by referencing the color-correcting LUT which is eventually prepared. Without these rules, printing will be hampered and high-quality printing will be impossible. On the other hand, these rules may be taken into account at the stage of adjusting the amount of inks of CMYKlclm; however, it is not desirable to adjust the amount of inks of CMYKlclm again when the color-correcting LUT is prepared after the color-separating LUT has been prepared. If adjustment is to be made to the correspondence between the RGB values and the CMYKlclm values prescribed in the color-separating LUT, it is necessary to make adjustments in conformity with the rules at the time of adjustment. So, according to the present invention, the color-correcting LUT is prepared by performing smoothing (mentioned later) while keeping the limit on ink deposition (mentioned above) which is taken into consideration in the color-separating LUT, thereby prescribing the strict correspondence between the colors expressed by RGB data and CMYKlclm data after processing.

Smoothing is defined as the process for smoothing the arrangement of lattice points in the Lab color space, each lattice point representing the color produced by the combination of CMYKlclm data specified in the color-separating LUT. That is, in the color-separating LUT, the arrangement of lattice points has a low degree of smoothness when the color defined by the combination of CMYKlclm data is expressed by the lattice points in the Lab color space. The state in which the arrangement of lattice points has a low degree of smoothness is a state-in which a curve is described by a high-order function, said curve connecting adjacent lattice points in the Lab color space and extending from one boundary to the other of the color gamut formed in the Lab color space.

The color-correcting LUT is prepared with the help of interpolation, as mentioned later. And, the color conversion referencing the color-correcting LUT also employs interpolation. There are several methods for interpolation, such as linear interpolation and spline interpolation. Any of these methods calculates the color at the lattice point for interpolation from the lattice points existing around the lattice point for interpolation. Therefore, if the arrangement of lattice points has a low degree of smoothness (or the above-mentioned curve is that of a high-order function), the accuracy of interpolation decreases.

As mentioned above, with the low accuracy of interpolation, it is impossible to accurately define the correspondence between RGB data and CMYKlclm data which are defined by the color-correcting LUT to be eventually prepared. This leads to a low accuracy of color conversion at the time of printing. Moreover, the arrangement of the lattice points represented by CMYKlclm data prescribed by the color-separating LUT is not uniform as a whole in the degree of smoothness. It varies depending on the positions in the Lab color space and the accuracy of interpolation also differs in the color space. This leads to local variation in the accuracy of color conversion. Printing in this state does not give a high-quality image with a smooth color change. This is true particularly in the printing of an image having a continuous color gradation.

When the accuracy of interpolation is taken into account, it is desirable that the smoothness of the arrangement of lattice points is even as a whole as mentioned above. On the other hand, there is an instance where accurate color conversion is more desirable in a specific region than in the other region in the color space, or it is desirable that the arrangement of lattice points is nonuniform from one region to another in the color space according to the characteristic properties of the ink to be used by the printing apparatus. Therefore, according to the present invention, the process for smoothing the arrangement of lattice point is carried out simultaneously with the process for making locally nonuniform the arrangement of lattice points. In other words, although it is basically desirable to smooth the arrangement of lattice points in the color space, the arrangement of lattice points is made locally nonuniform according to the intention of the user who prepares the LUT.

The color-separating LUT defines the correspondence between RGB data and CMYKlclm data as mentioned above. This object is achieved by making uniform the pitch of each RGB color, such that their lattice point forms the cubic lattice point in the orthogonal three-dimensional RGB color space, as shown in the upper left part of FIG. 2. These cubic lattice points are free of distortion in their arrangement and hence has a high degree of smoothness.

On the other hand, the color gamut defined by CMYKlclm data is distorted in the Lab color space. That is, the upper right part of FIG. 2 shows the color gamut in the Lab color space. As shown in this figure, the color gamut in the Lab color space has a distorted shape. Also, no consideration is given to the arrangement of mutually adjacent lattice points in the color-separating LUT, and the CMYKlclm data is determined in conformity with the above-mentioned rules. Therefore, if the color expressed by CMYKlclm data is arranged in the Lab color space, the lattice points are arranged as if there exist lattice points disorderly in the distorted color gamut. In other words, the arrangement of lattice points has a low degree of smoothness.

Consequently, the smoothing process in this embodiment is carried out as follows. The arrangement of lattice points for the color due to the CMYKlclm data defined by the color-separating LUT is smoothed in the virtual Lab color space, and the color-separating LUT in which the arrangement of lattice points has a high degree of smoothness is prepared. (This LUT is referred to as the no color adjustment LUT in this specification.) The lower part of FIG. 2 outlines the procedure to prepare the color-correcting LUT from the color-separating LUT. In this embodiment, the position of the RGB lattice point in the color-separating LUT is specified by the position information (Pr, Pg, Pb), and this position information as a variable is used to represent the lattice point in the virtual Lab color space in terms of vector L_(p)=f(Pr,Pg,Pb). The position information is updated sequentially.

In other words, the position information (Pr, Pg, Pb) is updated sequentially by recursive operation, so that the position of the lattice point represented by vector L_(p) is adjusted until the position of the lattice point to be adjusted becomes smooth relative to the position of the surrounding lattice points. Also, when this smoothing is carried out, according to the intention of the user who prepares the no color adjustment LUT, the arrangement of lattice points is not made completely smooth in a specific region in the color space and the arrangement of lattice points is regarded as optimal when the arrangement is nonuniform. Incidentally, the position information in this embodiment includes the number of lattice points in the direction of 0≦Pr≦R minus 1, the number of lattice points in the direction of 0≦Pg≦G minus 1, and the number of lattice points in the direction of 0≦Pb≦B minus 1. This position information may be RGB data so long as it can specify the position of the lattice point. However, the RGB data specified in the color-correcting LUT is identical to the RGB data specified by the color-separating LUT, as mentioned later. Therefore, even in this case, the position information is used to update the CMYKlclm data but is not used to update the values of the RGB data prescribed in the color-separating LUT.

Here, the lattice point in the virtual Lab color space has as its components the Lab value which is obtained by performing simple operation on the calorimetric value of a small number of color charts, thereby giving a virtual RGB brightness, and then converting it by a prescribed operational expression. This operation is simple one; but the operational expression is not physically meaningless. Rather, smoothing the arrangement of the lattice point gives the lattice point whose arrangement is sufficiently smoothed even in the actual Lab color space. In other words, the above-mentioned simple operation is one which is obtained by simplifying the Lambert-Beer's law. (Shimpen Shikisai Kagaku Handbook, 2nd edition, issued by Tokyo Daigaku Shuppnkai, p. 222) This operation gives an approximate actual Lab value for CMYKlclm data. So, this Lab value is regarded as the virtual Lab value in this specification.

If the position information (P′r, P′g, P′b) is determined such that it becomes the lattice point whose arrangement has a high degree of smoothness in the virtual Lab color space, then it is possible to prepare the above-mentioned no color adjustment LUT by calculating the amount of ink corresponding to the position information (P′r, P′g, P′b) by using the color-separating LUT. The enlarged schematic diagram in FIG. 2 shows the relation between the RGB data and the position information before and after smoothing. In this figure, black circles on the straight line denote the lattice points in the RGB color space, and the RGB data at each lattice point include R₀, G₀, B₀, and R₁, G₁, B₁.

When the lattice point whose RGB data include R₀, G₀, B₀ is the object for smoothing, it is assumed that the position information is (Pr, Pg, Pb) and the position information (P′r, P′g, P′b) indicating the position of lattice point corresponding to the white circle is obtained after smoothing. In this case, this position information specifies the lattice point of white circle, which is surrounded by lattice points associated with the CMYKlclm data that satisfy the above-mentioned rule for color separation. Thus, this data is used for interpolation to calculate the data C₁M₁Y₁lc₁m₁ corresponding to the lattice point indicated by the white circle. Thus, the RGB data (R₀, G₀, B₀) for the lattice point to be smoothed is associated with the CMYKlclm data (C₁M₁Y₁lc₁lm₁). The result is the no color adjustment LUT.

The smoothing process mentioned above permits one to calculate the CMYKlclm data corresponding to the position of the lattice point which has been optimized, while referencing only the CMYKlclm data defined by the color-separating LUT, thereby preparing the no color adjustment LUT in which the arrangement of lattice points in the Lab color space has a high degree of smoothness. In other words, the smoothing process is carried out in the virtual Lab color space and its variable is the position information. If it is so constructed that the position information is updated, it is possible to freely move the virtual Lab lattice point without considering the above-mentioned rule for color separation at the time of recursive operation. However, after the lattice point has been optimized, it references the CMYKlclm data defined by the color-separating LUT and calculates the CMYKlclm data corresponding to the position information after optimization.

Therefore, it is possible to acquire the CMYKlclm data after optimization only from the CMYKlclm data which is defined by the color-separating LUT and which satisfies the above-mentioned rule for color separation. That is, when there exist a large number of combinations of CMYKlclm corresponding to a certain color, it is possible to guarantee that the CMYKlclm data after optimization also satisfies the above-mentioned rule for color separation if interpolation is performed by referencing the CMYKlclm data which satisfies the rule for color separation. Incidentally, linear interpolation is desirable because its results do not deviate from the CMYKlclm data that satisfies the rule for color separation. Of course, non-linear interpolation would also roughly satisfy the rule for color separation.

As the result, it is possible to perform smoothing while keeping the various rules which were taken into account when the color-separating LUT was prepared, and it is possible to prepare the no color adjustment LUT which satisfies simultaneously the various rules, the arrangement of lattice points having a high degree of smoothness, and the locally nonuniform arrangement of lattice points. The arrangement of lattice points corresponding to the color prescribed by the no color adjustment LUT has a high degree of smoothness in the Lab color space, and since they are arranged as intended by the user who prepares the no color adjustment LUT, and consequently it is possible to execute accurate interpolation by referencing the color prescribed by the no color adjustment LUT, and it is also possible to prepare the no color adjustment LUT capable of color conversion as intended by one who prepares the LUT.

The no color adjustment LUT which has been prepared as mentioned above satisfies the various rules which were taken into account when the above-mentioned color-separating LUT was prepared and also prescribes the reference points that make smooth the arrangement of lattice points; however, it is not always the case that the color (specified by sRGB) having color component values of image data based on RGB data prescribed by the no color adjustment LUT agrees with the color resulting from printing based on the corresponding CMYKlclm data. In other words, this correspondence merely conforms to the above-mentioned rules when the above-mentioned color-separating LUT was prepared, and it is not guaranteed that both colors agree with each other.

So, the color-correcting LUT, which makes these colors agree with each other, is prepared. However, if the color systems are different, it is difficult to judge the agreement of colors. Consequently, in this embodiment, the color expressed by sRGB data in the Lab color space is made to correspond to the color expressed by CMYKlclm data. At the time of transformation from one color system to the other, interpolation is carried out. Since the color-correcting LUT mentioned above has been smoothed so that accurate interpolation is carried out, it is possible to prepare the color-correcting LUT which permits accurate color transformation by the accurate interpolation.

The first step to prepare the color-correcting LUT is to print a plurality of patches based on RGB data prescribed by the no color adjustment LUT, thereby acquiring color charts. In this no color adjustment LUT, the RGB data correspond to the CMYKlclm data and hence printing based on this RGB data is equivalent to printing based on the CMYKlclm data prescribed by the no color adjustment LUT. Once color charts are obtained, colorimetry is performed sequentially on the patches of charts by using a colorimeter. In this way it is possible to acquire the Lab values of patches printed according to RGB data prescribed by the no color adjustment LUT. On the other hand, the sRGB data as the reference points to be registered in the color-correcting LUT should be previously determined. (In this embodiment, this sRGB data is referred to as target.) It is possible to easily acquire the Lab values corresponding to the target because the Lab values corresponding to sRGB data can be obtained by the known formula.

If it is known that a color indicated by sRGB data takes on a certain value in the RGB color system prescribed in the no color adjustment LUT, then it is possible to prepare the color-correcting LUT which makes sRGB data to correspond to CMYKlclm data by converting RGB data into CMYKlclm data while referencing the no color adjustment LUT. So, interpolation is carried out by referencing the Lab values of the patches printed according to RGB data prescribed in the no color adjustment LUT and the RGB data corresponding to the Lab values of the color expressed by the sRGB data is acquired.

And, the CMYKlclm data corresponding to the RGB data is acquired by referencing the no color adjustment LUT. Since this RGB data correspond to the Lab values of the color expressed by the sRGB data, the color expressed by the CMYKlclm data agrees with the color expressed by the sRGB data. Therefore, it is possible to prepare the color-correcting LUT by preparing the table which associates them with each other. Incidentally, in this embodiment, gamut mapping is performed before the Lab values of target are associated with the RGB data in the no color adjustment LUT.

In other words, the color gamut of the color that can be expressed by sRGB data differs in magnitude from the color gamut of the color that can be expressed by the RGB data prescribed by the no color adjustment LUT; therefore, the color gamut is compressed so that they agree with each other. Of course, various corrections other than gamut mapping may be carried out. For example, color correction may be made such that the corrected color is close to the human's memory color, because the human's memory color differs from the actual color (humans tend to remember the color of the sky and skin more vividly than actual). In any case, it is possible to prepare the color-correcting LUT which associates sRGB data with CMYKlclm data by the data prescribed in the no color adjustment LUT if any color is examined in terms of Lab value by colorimetry and formula for conversion of sRGB.

Incidentally, smoothing in the present invention is intended to improve the degree of smoothness of the arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color space; however, if one's attention is paid only to improvement in the degree of smoothness of arrangement, it is possible to carry out smoothing in any stage (shown in FIG. 1) of preparing the color-correcting LUT. However, if the procedure is modified such that smoothing is carried out when the no color adjustment LUT is prepared and subsequently colorimetry is performed to associate it with the target Lab value, it is possible to establish an accurate correspondence between the target Lab value and the RGB data of the no color adjustment LUT.

In other words, the degree of smoothness of the arrangement of lattice points improves even in the case where smoothing is accomplished in the device-independent color space by means of the Lab values obtained by colorimetry which is performed on color charts obtained before smoothing is carried out based on the RGB data prescribed in the color-separating LUT and the CMYKlclm data. However, the Lab values after smoothing differ in color from the CMYKlclm data of the object for color measurement. Also, even though one attempts to calculate by interpolation the CMYKlclm data corresponding to the Lab value after smoothing, it is impossible to perform accurate interpolation because the neighboring Lab values to be referenced at the time of interpolation are lattice points before smoothing.

Therefore, in any way, the Lab values after smoothing vary in color from the CMYKlclm data prescribed in the color-separating LUT. Even though the color-correcting LUT is prepared under this condition by associating the Lab values after smoothing with the target Lab values, it is impossible to accurately define the correspondence between the sRGB data defined by the color-correcting LUT and the CMYKlclm data, and the accuracy for color transformation at the time of printing becomes poor. On the other hand, in the present invention, smoothing is performed in the device-independent color space, the CMYKlclm data corresponding to the optimized position information is acquired by interpolation based on the CMYKlclm data prescribed by the color-separating LUT, the no color adjustment LUT is prepared, and subsequently colorimetry is carried out to associate the RGB data of the no color adjustment LUT (or CMYKlclm data) with the target Lab values.

Consequently, there is no possibility that the color corresponding to the calorimetric value deviates from the color represented by the CMYKlclm data. And, when interpolation is carried out to associate the colorimetric value with the target Lab value, accurate results of interpolation can be obtained because the neighboring Lab values referenced at the time of interpolation are the lattice points after smoothing. As the result, it is possible to prepare the color-correcting LUT that permits accurate color transformation by smoothing the arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color space.

(2) Print Controlling Apparatus.

The smoothing process according to the present invention is used to prepare the color-correcting LUT, which is then referenced by the print controlling apparatus when printing is carried out. FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing the hardware structure of the print controlling apparatus. FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing the program to be executed by the print controlling apparatus. The print controlling apparatus pertaining to this embodiment consists of a general-purpose PC. It is connected to a variety of peripherals, as shown in FIG. 3, to process images for printing and perform printing.

That is, the PC 12 is provided with the scanner 11 a, the digital still camera 11 b, and the video camera 11 c, as the image input devices, which are connected to the PC 12. The image of each input device is composed of pixels in dot matrix state and is capable of expressing about 16,700,000 colors, with each of the RGB three primaries representing 256 gradations. In this embodiment, the sRGB color system is used for the image data, so that color conversion can be accomplished by means of the above-mentioned color-correcting LUT.

To the PC 12 are connected the flexible disc drive 13 a, the hard disc 13 b, and the CD-ROM drive 13 c as external auxiliary storage. The hard disc 13 b stores the main program relating to the system; it is capable of reading programs from the flexible disc and CD-ROM when necessary. Also, to the PC 12 is connected the modem 14 a as the communication device to connect the PC 12 to the external network. The modem 14 a is connected to the external network through the public communication lines. The system in this example is constructed such that the modem 14 a permits external access through the telephone line; however, access to the network may be achieved through the LAN adaptor. The PC 12 also has the keyboard 15 a and mouse 15 b connected thereto for input operation.

The PC 12 is further provided with the display 17 a, the printer 17 c, and the projector 17 b as image output devices. The display 17 a has a display area composed of 800 pixels in the horizontal direction and 600 pixels in the vertical direction, with each pixel displaying 16,700,000 colors as mentioned above. This resolution is merely an example. It may be changed to 640×480 pixels or 1024×768 pixels according to circumstances. The printer 17 c is an ink-jet printer which is capable of printing images on printing paper (as a medium) with dots of color inks of six colors of CMYKlclm.

On the other hand, prescribed programs are executed by the PC 12 in order to input images by using the image input devices and to display or output them on the image output devices. Of these programs, the one which works as the basic program is the operating system (OS) 12 a, which includes the display driver 12 b for display on the display 17 a, the printer driver 12 c for print output to the printer 17 c, and the projector driver 12 i (not shown) for display on the projector 17 b.

These drivers 12 b, 12 c, and 12 i are dependent on the kind of the display 17 a, the printer 17 c, and the projector 17 b. They may be added or modified for the operating system 12 a according to the kind of the device. They may realize additional functions more than the standard process depending on the kind of device. It is possible to realize various additional processing within the permissible range while maintaining the common processing system on the standard system called the operating system 12 a.

As the premise for execution of these programs, the PC 12 has the CPU 12 e, the RAM 12 f, the ROM 12 g, and the I/O 12 h. The CPU 12 e, which performs arithmetic operation, executes the basic programs written in the RAM 12 f while using the RAM 12 f as a temporary work area or memory area or program area, thereby controlling the external and internal devices connected through the I/O 12 h.

The application 12 d is executed on the operating system 12 a as the basic program. What is processed by the application 12 d is widely varied. It monitors the operation of the keyboard 15 a and the mouse 15 b as the operating device, controls adequately the external devices (when operated) and executes the corresponding arithmetic operations, and displays the results of processing on the display 17 a or outputs them to the printer 17 c. The computer system mentioned above acquires image data by means of the scanner 11 a as the image input device and then performs prescribed image processing by the application 12 d. It finally displays or outputs the results on the display 17 a, the printer 17 c, or the projector 17 b as the image output device.

Therefore, in this embodiment, the print controlling apparatus is realized as the computer system; however, such a computer system is not always necessary, and it may be any system capable of image processing by the present invention for the similar image data. For example, the system may be such that the digital still camera is provided with a module that performs image processing and the image data which has undergone image processing is used for printing on the printer.

Also, in the printer that performs printing with input of image data without passing through the computer system, it is possible to construct the system such that it automatically performs image processing and printing according to the present invention for the image data entered through the scanner, digital camera, or modem. In addition, the system is applicable to various devices, such as color faccimil, color copier, and projector, which handle image data, as a matter of course. Printing may be carried out by distributed processing with a plurality of computers.

When the above-mentioned PC 12 is used as the print controlling apparatus according to the present invention, the necessary processing is carried out as explained in the following. The PC 12 acquires image data representing input image from the scanner 11 a, digital camera 11 b, and video camera 11 c and image data representing output image to the display 17 a and projector 17 b. It performs color conversion by referencing the color-correcting LUT and then executes printing on the printer 17 c. In other words, it performs color conversion by referencing the color-correcting LUT in the case where the same image is handled by different image devices (such as image input device and image output device) and in the case where the color of each pixel in the image data used in each image device is expressed in the different color spaces.

In order to execute printing by using the color-correcting LUT, the above-mentioned PC 12 in this embodiment has the above-mentioned printer driver 12 c, which performs data processing at the time of printing, and the LUT preparing unit 20, which prepares the color-correcting LUT, as shown in FIG. 4. The printer driver 12 c has the image data acquisition module 31, color correction module 32, and the halftoning module 33. The image data acquisition module 31 is a module to acquire image data representing the image for printing. When the number of pixels of the acquired image does not match the number of pixels necessary for printing, the image data acquisition module 31 executes resolution conversion to make them match each other. The color correction module 32 is a module to transform the color system of the image data by interpolation, and it acquires image data from the image data acquisition module 31 and transforms the color system.

That is, it references either of the color-correcting LUT 41 or the no color adjustment LUT 42 (both stored in the hard disc 13 c) and calculates the combination of values of CMYKlclm color components corresponding to the combination of values of arbitrary RGB color components. When the application 12 d instructs image printing, the color correction module 32 performs color conversion by referencing the color-correcting LUT, thereby executing accurate color conversion. When the LUT preparing unit 20 prepares the no color adjustment LUT 42 or the color-correcting LUT 41, the color correction module 32 performs color conversion by referencing the color-separating LUT 43 or the no color adjustment LUT 42. Therefore, the color correction module 32 performs color conversion by selecting an adequate LUT according to the object, and printing is performed with the data after color conversion.

After the color correction module 32 has performed color conversion and generated CMYKlclm data, the CMYKlclm data is transferred to the halftoning module 33. The half-toning module 33 is a module which converts the CMYKlclm tone values of each dot and performs halftoning process to represent with the recording density of ink drops. It generates the head drive data to make ink adhere in the recording density after conversion. The printing module 34 receives the head drive data and rearranges them in the order for use by the printer 17 c.

That is, the printer 17 c is provided with a train of ejecting nozzles (not shown) as the ink ejecting device. The nozzle train has a plurality of ejection nozzles arranged in the secondary scanning direction; therefore, data several dots apart in the secondary scanning direction are used at the same time. So, rasterizing is performed to rearrange the order of data such that, of the data arranged in the primary scanning direction, those which are used at the same time are buffered in the printer 17 c at the same time. After this rasterizing, the printing module 34 generates printing data (with additional information such as image resolution) and outputs it to the printer 17 c. The printer 17 c prints the image represented by the image data according to the printing data.

In this embodiment, the LUT preparing unit 20 is in the PC 12 as the print controlling apparatus, and the LUT preparing unit 20 prepares the color-correcting LUT 41 before printing. The LUT preparing unit 20 has the module 21 to determine Lab values, the module 22 to generate the color-correcting LUT, and the module 23 to perform smoothing. Moreover, the PC 12 has the colorimeter 50 connected thereto through an interface (not shown). The colorimeter 50 measures each patch on the color chart printed by the printer 17 c and supplies the PC 12 with the resulting calorimetric values, such as Lab values and density values.

In order for the LUT preparing unit 20 to prepare the color-correcting LUT 41, the color-separating LUT 43 is previously prepared and recorded in the hard disc 13 b, and the no color adjustment LUT 42 is prepared and recorded in the hard disc 13 b when the color-correcting LUT 41 is prepared. That is, the smoothing module 23 references the color-separating LUT 43 and acquires the colorimetric values of the color chart from the colorimeter 50, and finally it prepares the no color adjustment LUT 42 by the procedure mentioned in detail in the following.

The module 21 to determine Lab values is a module which determines the sRGB data of the target and calculates the color values (Lab values) according to predetermined formulas. The module 22 to generate color-correcting LUT is a module which performs processing to prepare the color-correcting LUT 41 from the no color adjustment LUT 42 by the process shown in FIG. 1. First, the module 22 to generate color-correcting LUT prepares the image data of the patch with each RGB data prescribed in the no color adjustment LUT and outputs the results to the color correcting module 32.

At this time, the color correcting module 32 references the no color adjustment LUT 42, thereby acquiring CMYKlclm data corresponding to each RGB data, and transfers the CMYKlclm data to the halftoning module 33. The halftoning module 33 and the printing module 34 print patches in response to the CMYKlclm data. As the result, there are obtained color charts printed in response to each RGB data specified in the no color adjustment LUT 42. These color charts are measured for color by the calorimeter 50, and their Lab values are entered into the module 22 to generate the color-correcting LUT.

Also, the module 22 to generate the color-correcting LUT acquires the color values of sRGB data determined by the module 21 to determine the target Lab values. It performs such process as gamut mapping and interpolation and calculates RGB data (in the RGB color system to be used by the no color adjustment LUT 42) corresponding to the target's sRGB values. Moreover, it converts the acquired RGB data by means of the no color adjustment LUT 42, thereby acquiring the corresponding CMYKlclm data. It associates this CMYKlclm data with the sRGB data, thereby preparing the color-correcting LUT 41, and records it in the hard disc 13 b.

(3) Smoothing Process

The above-mentioned smoothing process will be described in more detail in the following. FIG. 5 is a block diagram showing the construction of the smoothing module 23. FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing the process which is carried out by the smoothing module 23. The smoothing module 23 has the unit 23 a for converting intermediate RGB brightness, the unit 23 b for extracting objects to be optimized, the unit 23 c for calculating virtual Lab values, the unit 23 d for extracting objects for calculation, the unit 23 e for calculating the evaluation function, the unit 23 f for updating position information, the unit 23 g for calculating ink amounts, and the unit 23 h for generating no color adjustment LUT.

The unit 23 a for converting intermediate RGB brightness is a unit which references the above-mentioned calorimetric value and converts them into intermediate RGB brightness by simple operation. In Step S100, the unit 23 a for converting intermediate RGB brightness converts the colorimetric value 45 into intermediate RGB brightness and records the result of conversion, in terms of the value of intermediate RGB brightness 25 a, in the RAM 12 f. To be more specific, the smoothing module extracts about 16-32 gradation values from 256 gradations for each color of each ink color in CMYKlclm and then generates the image data that causes patches to be printed with each single color for the extracted gradation values and then outputs them to the halftoning module 33.

As the result, 16-32 patches are printed in single color for each color. The colorimeter 50 measures these patches and white paper (not printed with ink) so as to acquire the values of CMY density for each color. Here, if the value of CMY density does not increase or decrease monotonously for the change in gradation of each ink color, it does not converge into the optimal solution in the optimizing process mentioned later but it falls into the extremum solution; therefore, smoothing is carried out before-hand so that the value of CMY density for each color increases or decreases monotonously.

The unit 23 a for converting intermediate RGB brightness substitutes the value of CMY density into the formula (1) below, thereby calculating the intermediate RGB brightness for each patch of each ink color.

$\begin{matrix} {\quad\left\{ \begin{matrix} {{Tr}_{i} = 10^{- {Dc}_{i}}} \\ {{Tg}_{i} = {10^{- {Dm}_{i}}\mspace{25mu}\left( {i = {1\mspace{14mu}\ldots\mspace{14mu} 6}} \right)}} \\ {{Tb}_{i} = 10^{- {Dy}_{i}}} \end{matrix} \right.} & (1) \end{matrix}$ Incidentally, the formula (1) is a general formula to convert density into brightness; in this embodiment, the intermediate RGB brightness is obtained by regarding the CMY density as the independent variable for each color component. Here, Tr, Tg, Tb are referred to as intermediate RGB brightness, and they represent respectively the R brightness component, G brightness component, and B brightness component in each patch of each ink in single color. Also, Dc, Dm, Dy represent respectively the C density component, M density component, and Y density component, and i is a sign to distinguish ink colors.

The foregoing operation gives the intermediate RGB brightness for printing with the ink gradation value of each ink in single color. Therefore, if the correspondence between the intermediate RGB brightness and the ink gradation value of single color of each ink is referenced, it is possible to calculate the intermediate RGB brightness corresponding to the arbitrary gradation value of ink in single color by interpolation. By the foregoing processing, the intermediate RGB brightness is acquired and this value is recorded in the RAM 12 f as the intermediate RGB brightness value 23 a.

In this embodiment, the virtual Lab value is calculated as mentioned above, and the virtual Lab value is changed in the virtual Lab color space by regarding as the variable the position information of lattice points in the color-separating LUT. Then, the unit 23 c for calculating virtual Lab values calculates from the intermediate RGB brightness the RGB brightness corresponding to CMYKlclm data in the color-separating LUT 43 and calculates the Lab values from this RGB brightness and records them in the RAM 12 f as the virtual Lab values 25 c. Incidentally, since this intermediate RGB brightness is calculated by a simple formula from the intermediate RGB brightness, this RGB brightness is referred to as the virtual RGB brightness in this specification.

To be concrete, in Step S105, the unit 23 b for extracting objects to be optimized records the CMYKlclm data prescribed in the color-separating LUT 43 in the RAM 12 f as the ink amount data 25 b. In Step S110, the unit 23 c for calculating virtual Lab values calculates the virtual RGB brightness corresponding to the color represented by CMYKlclm data (this color is in the state of combination of each ink color according to the formula (2) below) for the ink amount data 25 b.

$\quad\begin{matrix} \left\{ \begin{matrix} {R = {\prod\limits_{i = 1}^{6}{Tr}_{i}}} \\ {G = {\prod\limits_{i = 1}^{6}{Tg}_{i}}} \\ {B = {\prod\limits_{i = 1}^{6}{Tb}_{i}}} \end{matrix} \right. & (2) \end{matrix}$

After the virtual RGB brightness has been calculated as mentioned above, the calculated virtual RGB brightness is converted into the value of the XYZ color system by the 3×3 matrix and the value of the XYZ color system is further converted into the value of the Lab color system. The converted virtual Lab value is the above-mentioned virtual Lab value 25 c; in this stage, the virtual Lab value corresponding to the CMYKlclm data prescribed by the color-separating LUT 43 is recorded in the RAM 12 f.

As mentioned above, in this embodiment, the virtual RGB brightness and the virtual Lab value corresponding to it are calculated by simple operation from a small number (say, about 16-32) of patches for each ink. Here, the number of data to be calculated is equal to the number of all the reference points prescribed in the color-separating LUT 43; however, the objects for colorimetry are 16-32 multiplied by the number of inks plus paper white, and their number is much smaller than the number of reference points; therefore, it is possible to carry out processing much faster than the case in which all colors are measured.

Also, after smoothing in this embodiment, the module 22 to generate the color-correcting LUT performs the processing which makes correspondence between the device-independent color and the RGB color (CMYKlclm data in its turn) in the no color adjustment LUT 42; therefore, it is not important in the smoothing process that the lattice points represent exactly correct colors. In other words, what is important is the degree of smoothness of the arrangement of lattice points. If the virtual Lab value is entirely different from the actual Lab value when the arrangement of lattice points is smoothed, then smoothing is nonsense; however, in this embodiment, the above-mentioned formulas (1) and (2) are based on the simplified Lambert-Beer's law, and hence there is no possibility that the virtual Lab value is entirely different from the actual Lab value. The present applicant's experiments revealed that the simple operation in this embodiment fully produces the effect of smoothing the arrangement of lattice points and that it is possible to prepare the color-correcting LUT that permits accurate color conversion.

Incidentally, the above-mentioned operation is merely an example; it is possible to calculate the above-mentioned virtual Lab value by various operations so long as it is close to the actual Lab value and the smoothing effect is fully produced. Colorimetry may be actually carried out if labor is not a problem. Selecting 16-32 gradations is also merely an example; the number of gradations may be smaller or larger than that. About 16-32 gradations generally give a good result. Moreover, gradations of patches for colorimetry may be selected variously; it is possible to select gradations uniformly, or alternatively, it is possible to select more of gradations with smaller values in view of the ink characteristics that the larger the gradation value, the smaller the degree of change in density. Of course, it is possible to change the way of selecting gradations for each color. It is also possible to calculate by interpolation the CMY density corresponding to the ink amount by referencing the gradation of CMY density obtained by colorimetry and then acquire the intermediate RGB brightness.

In this embodiment, smoothing is accomplished recursively for each lattice point by the RGB data of the color-separating LUT by utilizing the above-mentioned intermediate RGB brightness value 25a, ink amount data 25 b, and virtual Lab value 25 c. In Step S115, the unit 23 b for extracting objects to be optimized extracts the CMYKlclm data which has not yet undergone smoothing from a plurality of data recorded as the ink amount data 25 b and extracts it as the object to be optimized. In Step S120, the unit 23 c for calculating virtual Lab values calculates the virtual Lab values corresponding to the CMYKlclm data. In other words, it calculates the virtual Lab value corresponding to the CMYKlclm data to be optimized from the intermediate RGB brightness value 25 a and the ink amount data 25 b.

Smoothing is accomplished by utilizing the virtual Lab values corresponding to the CMYKlclm data to be optimized and the virtual Lab values corresponding to the neighboring lattice points. So, in Step S125, the unit 23 d for extracting objects for calculation extracts the virtual Lab values corresponding to the lattice points which are present around the Lab lattice points to be optimized and which are adjacent to said lattice points. Incidentally, the virtual Lab values to be extracted vary depending on the spatial position of the virtual Lab lattice points to be optimized. This will be described later in detail.

The unit 23 e for calculating the evaluation function calculates the evaluation function by utilizing the lattice point to be optimized (extracted in Step S127 and Step S130) and its neighboring lattice points. The evaluation function is a function whose value becomes smaller as the arrangement of the virtual Lab lattice points to be optimized is smoothed. Its variable is the position information which specifies the position of RGB lattice point of the color-separating LUT 43. In other words if the position information is adjusted, the virtual Lab values to be optimized vary and the optimized position information (or the position information which minimizes the evaluation function) is obtained. Incidentally, the evaluation function is a function which has the property that its value becomes smaller as the arrangement of virtual Lab lattice points to be optimized is smoothed. In order to permit the arrangement of lattice points to become locally nonuniform, the unit 23 e for calculating the evaluation function adds a weighting factor to the evaluation function, depending on the region in the color space, such that the value becomes smaller as the distance between the lattice point to be optimized and its neighboring lattice point approaches a certain ratio.

Therefore, the unit 23 e for calculating the evaluation function is provided with the unit 23 e 1 for calculating the distance ratio, which calculates, in Step S127, the distance between the lattice point to be optimized and the RGB lattice point in the color-separating LUT corresponding to its neighboring lattice point, and uses the calculated result as the weighting factor. Incidentally, the region in the color space that makes the arrangement of lattice points nonuniform may be determined arbitrarily beforehand by the user who prepares the no color adjustment LUT 42. In Step S130, the unit 23 e for calculating the evaluation function calculates the evaluation function by adding or not adding an adequate weighting factor to each region in the color space. Also, the evaluation function varies in its form depending on the spatial position of the virtual Lab lattice point to be optimized. The evaluation function is prepared by selecting the function form adequately according to the spatial position of the virtual Lab lattice point. This will be explained later in more detail.

Moreover, the unit 23 e for calculating the evaluation function calculates the value of the evaluation function calculated in Step S130 mentioned above, and in Step S135, it judges whether or not the calculated value is lower than a prescribed threshold value. In other words, when the value of the evaluation function is lower than the prescribed value, it judges that the position of the virtual Lab lattice point has been optimized (or sufficiently smoothed). If it is judged in Step S135 that the position of the virtual Lab lattice point is not optimized, the unit 23 f for updating position information updates the optimized position information and records it in the RAM 12 f as the position information 25 d.

The next step after the position information has been updated is to calculate again the evaluation function in order to judge whether or not the virtual Lab value to be optimized is optimized by the ink amount corresponding to the RGB lattice point specified by the position information. In other words, in Step S145, the unit 23 g for calculating ink amounts references the position information 25 d and calculates the ink amount data (CMYKlclm data) corresponding to the updated position information. At this time, it references the ink amount data 25 b and calculates the ink amount corresponding to the position information which has been updated by interpolation.

If the ink amount corresponding to the updated position information is calculated as mentioned above, it is possible to calculate the updated virtual Lab value from the ink amount. Therefore, by repeating the process after Step S120, it is possible to converge the value of the evaluation function below the specific threshold value mentioned above and it is possible to optimize the position of the virtual Lab lattice point. That is, the arrangement of lattice points is converged to the optimal position by optimizing the position information by the evaluation function (or minimizing the evaluation function) and by repeating the process after Step S120 until the virtual Lab lattice point is optimized (or the arrangement of lattice points is smoothed). Incidentally, as a concrete algorithm for optimization, it is possible to adopt various algorithms such as quasi-Newton method and conjugate gradient method.

On the other hand, when it is judged that the position of the virtual Lab lattice point has been optimized in Step S135, the ink amount data 25 b is overwritten by the ink amount corresponding to the virtual Lab value at the time of optimization in Step S150, and it judges in Step S155 whether or not optimization is completed for all of the ink amount data 25 b. And, the process after Step S115 is repeated until it judges in Step S155 that optimization is completed for all the ink amount data 25 b.

In addition, in Step S160, it judges whether or not correction has been executed as many times as previously determined and repeats the process after Step S115 until it is judged that correction has been repeated as many times as prescribed. In other words, by repeating correction as many times as prescribed, it is guaranteed that the result of the optimizing process becomes the true solution. Of course, it is acceptable if it is guaranteed that it is completely optimized as a whole in Step S160, it is possible to judge for the total ink amount whether or not the value of the evaluation function and its average value are lower than the prescribed threshold value. Also, various constitutions may be adopted, for example, it is possible to recognize that complete optimization has been achieved when the average value of the evaluation function is approximately equal to the (n−1)th correction and the nth correction.

After the arrangement of lattice points has been smoothed sufficiently as mentioned above, it is possible to associate the RGB data with the ink amount data indicating the smoothed color in the Lab color space by associating the ink amount data 25 b with the RGB data specified in the LUT 43 for color separation. So, in Step S165, the unit 23 h for generating no color adjustment LUT overwrites the CMYKlclm data prescribed in the color-separating LUT 43 with the ink amount data 25 b, thereby generating the no color adjustment LUT 42 in which the arrangement of lattice points has been smoothed and recording it in the hard disc 13 b.

As mentioned above, in this embodiment, it is not always the case that the components of each color of the ink amount or CMYKlclm data are directly adjusted. If CMYKlclm data is to be adjusted, it is necessary to make adjustment in such a way that the rule considered when the color-separating LUT 43 has been prepared is satisfied. In consideration of this rule, arbitrariness is low when the CMYKlclm data is adjusted, and it sometimes becomes difficult that the arrangement of lattice points is sufficiently smoothed. However, in this embodiment, CMYKlclm data is not adjusted directly, but rather, the position information is made to change and the virtual Lab lattice points are adjusted.

Therefore, it is not necessary to take into consideration the rule applied when the color-separating LUT 43 is prepared and hence the degree of freedom in moving the virtual Lab lattice points is large. As the result, it is possible to easily optimize the arrangement of the virtual Lab lattice points. On the other hand, in Step S145, the ink amount data corresponding to the lattice point in terms of the updated position information 25 d is obtained by referencing the ink amount prescribed in the color-separating LUT or the ink amount after smoothing. Therefore, the rule applied when the color-separating LUT 43 is prepared is reflected without deviation from the combination of the ink amount in the color-separating LUT. Therefore, the no color adjustment LUT 42 to be prepared satisfies the rule applied when the color-separating LUT is prepared and the arrangement of lattice points is also smoothed. At the time of this smoothing, it is possible to make nonuniform the arrangement of lattice points depending on the region in the color space as mentioned above, and hence it is not indiscriminately judged that the uniform arrangement of lattice points is most smoothed.

(4) Optimization by Means of Evaluation Function

Next, the optimization by means of the evaluation function in Steps S120 to S140 will be described in detail in the following. FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram showing the color gamut of the printer 17 c in the Lab color space. The color gamut of the printer 17 c is distorted in the Lab color space, as shown in this figure. Also, since the virtual Lab value is close to the actual Lab value as mentioned above, the color gamut which the virtual Lab value forms has the same shape as the solid body shown in FIG. 7. On the other hand, when the color of an image is expressed in terms of the combination of RGB data in the color-separating LUT, the color gamut in the RGB color space which is formed such that the component of each of RGB constitute the axes of the orthogonal three-dimensional space takes on the cubic shape shown in the upper left part in FIG. 2.

The color gamut in the Lab color space has a distorted shape, but the boundary of that color gamut can be easily associated with the boundary of the color gamut in the RGB color space. That is, the boundary of the color gamut in the RGB color space consists of 12 edge lines and 6 planes forming the cubic body. The boundary of the color gamut in the Lab color space also consists of 12 edge lines and 6 planes. To be concrete, the color changes from K to B if the B component only has finite values along the edge line on the B axis from the origin in the RGB color space, with the R and G components fixed at the minimum values, and the colors in the Lab color space corresponding to these colors are on the edge line indicated by E₁ in FIG. 7.

Similarly, in the cubic body shown in the upper left part of FIG. 2, the apexes at the uppermost plane represent respectively BWCM (W=white). The colors on this plane may be expressed by fixing the B component only at the maximum value and varying other components arbitrarily. The colors on this plane are on the plane indicated by E₂ in the color gamut shown in FIG. 7. Therefore, it can be said that the color is on the boundary of the color gamut if any one of the RGB data of the color-separating LUT has the maximum or minimum value. If the color on this boundary of the color gamut is freely movable in the virtual Lab color space when the above-mentioned optimization is carried out, it would be impossible to secure the sufficient large color gamut. So, in this embodiment, in order to maintain the size of the color gamut, the evaluation function is acquired which differs in function form on the 12 edge lines formed at the boundary of the color gamut, on the 6 outer planes, and in the color gamut.

In addition, if the arrangement of lattice points is uniformly smoothed in the entire color gamut, it is possible to keep at a certain high level the accuracy of interpolation in the entire color gamut. However, to cope with a situation in which lattice points to be formed in the RGB color space by RGB data prescribed by the LUT for color separation 43 are originally nonuniform or the intervals of lattice points in the virtual Lab color space is to be made intentionally nonuniform, the evaluation function is calculated by adding a specific weight to each region in the color space. In this case, it is possible to smooth the arrangement of lattice points by tempering with this characteristic even in the case where the intervals of lattice points are to be made nonuniform according to ink characteristics or in the case where the number of lattice points is increased at a low ink recording ratio in consideration of the ink characteristic that the degree of change in density decreases as the ink recording ratio increases. Moreover, by designing the weighted evaluation function it is possible to locally increase the density of lattice points in the virtual Lab color space, thereby to smooth the arrangement of lattice points while locally improving the accuracy of color conversion.

(4-1) Evaluation Function E₁

FIG. 8 is a diagram that illustrates the evaluation function to optimize the lattice point on the edge line formed on the color gamut in the Lab color space. In this figure, the curves drawn with broken lines represent the edge lines formed on the boundary of the color gamut. The lattice point to be optimized is indicated by a black circle, and the neighboring lattice points are indicated by white circles. In order to maintain the size of the color gamut, it is necessary that the lattice point to be optimized (indicated by the black circle) should be on the edge line indicated by the broken line. So, in this embodiment, when the unit 23 b for extracting objects to be optimized extracts the lattice point on the edge line indicated by the broken line as the object to be optimized, as shown in FIG. 8, the unit 23 d for extracting objects for calculation extracts, as the lattice point for calculation, the lattice point which is adjacent to the lattice point to be optimized and present on the edge line indicated by the broken line.

In this figure, the lattice point to be optimized is denoted by the vector L_(p), and the lattice points to be extracted by the unit 23 d for extracting objects for calculation are denoted by the vectors L_(a1) and L_(a2). Here, the vector L_(p) is calculated by the formula (3) below, and it is expressed in terms of the above-mentioned position information (Pr, Pg, Pb) as the variables. In this embodiment, the position information may be a variable which univocally specifies the virtual Lab value and a value that can specify the position of the RGB lattice point in the color-separating LUT. {right arrow over (L _(p))}=f(Pr,Pg,Pb)  (3)

Also, f in this formula is a function which obtains the virtual Lab vector from the position information (Pr, Pg, Pb). The function f is the formula for interpolation to calculate the ink amount corresponding to the position information (Pr, Pg, Pb) and the formula to calculate the virtual Lab value through the XYZ color system by the above-mentioned formula (2) and the above-mentioned matrix from the ink amount after said calculation.

The evaluation function utilizes these vectors L_(p), L_(a1), and L_(a2) and calculates by the formula (4) shown below. E ₁ =|W ₁({right arrow over (L _(a1))}−{right arrow over (L _(p))})+W ₂({right arrow over (L _(a2))}−{right arrow over (L _(p))})  (4) where, W₁ and W₂ are weighting factors.

In other words, if W₁>W₂ in the formula (4), it is possible to make small the value of the evaluation function E₁ in the state that the magnitude of vector L_(a1)−vector L_(p) is smaller than the magnitude of vector L_(a2)−vector L_(p), and the state in which the lattice point to be optimized is close to one of the lattice points is optimal. In the case where the arrangement of lattice points is by nonuniform intervals, it is possible to determine the weighting factor, for example, according to the formula (5) below.

$\quad\begin{matrix} \left\{ \begin{matrix} {W_{1} = \frac{D_{2}}{D_{1} + D_{2}}} \\ {W_{2} = \frac{D_{1}}{D_{1} + D_{2}}} \end{matrix} \right. & (5) \end{matrix}$ where, D₁ and D₂ are distances in the RGB color space. D₁ denotes the distance between the RGB lattice point in the color-separating LUT that gives the virtual Lab vector L_(a1) and the RGB lattice point in the color-separating LUT that gives the vector L_(p). D₂ denotes the distance between the RGB lattice point in the color-separating LUT that gives the virtual Lab vector L_(a2) and the RGB lattice point in the color-separating LUT that gives the vector L_(p). Needless to say, the formula (5) is merely one example. By designing another weighted evaluation function, it is possible to control the distance between lattice points in the virtual Lab color space by means of the lattice points which the RGB data of the color-separating LUT constitutes or by locally increasing the density of lattice points in the virtual Lab color space according to a specific intention.

Incidentally, as the weighting factor, it is possible to adopt various modes. Of course, W₁=W₂ when it is desirable that the arrangement of lattice points be even. In this case, the value is minimal if each distance between the lattice point to be optimized and its neighboring lattice points is equal and its direction is opposite, and the value is larger as the distances vary more and deviate more from the opposite direction. In other words, in the evaluation function for the object to be optimized at the region where the arrangement of lattice points is to be made even, smoothing is performed while keeping uniform, in principle, the arrangement of lattice points, with W₁=W₂; however, either of W₁ or W₂ is made larger in the region where it is desirable to make nonuniform locally.

When E₁ in the formula (4) is minimized, it is possible to optimize the arrangement of lattice points. In the case of W₁=W₂, E₁ becomes smaller as the distances between the lattice point to be optimized and its neighboring lattice points become equal and hence it is possible to acquire the vector L′_(p), with the position of lattice points of the vector L_(p) optimized, as shown in the right part of FIG. 8. When either of W₁ or W₂ is large, the lattice point to be optimized is optimized such that it is close to any of neighboring lattice points.

Also, the vectors L_(p), L_(a1), and L_(a2) are represented by the position information (Pr, Pg, Pb); however, in the evaluation function E₁, the position information that gives the vectors L_(a1) and L_(a2) is fixed and it is the position information (Pr, Pg, Pb) that gives the vector L_(p), only one of them is variable and other two are fixed at the minimum or maximum value. For example, the color on the edge line indicated by the broken line in FIG. 8 exists between B and K and the position information Pr and Pg that specify the RGB lattice point corresponding to this color is the minimal value and the position information Pb is an arbitrary value. So, in order to move the lattice point in the Lab color space along this edge line, it is only necessary that the position information Pr and Pg be fixed at minimum and the Pb be variable.

This is the same for the other edge line of the boundary of the color gamut. When the lattice point to be optimized exists on the boundary of the color gamut and the edge line from K to R, the position information Pg and Pb is fixed at minimum and Pr is made variable. When the lattice point to be optimized exists on the boundary of the color gamut and the edge line from K to G, the position information Pr and Pb is fixed at minimum and Pg is made variable. In addition, when the lattice point to be optimized exists on the boundary of the color gamut and the edge line from W to C, the position information Pg and Pb is fixed at maximum and Pr is made variable. When the lattice point to be optimized exists on the boundary of the color gamut and the edge line from W to M, the position information Pr and Pb is fixed at maximum and Pr is made variable. When the lattice point to be optimized exists on the boundary of the color gamut and the edge line from W to Y, the position information Pr and Pb is fixed at maximum and Pr is made variable.

Moreover, when the lattice point to be optimized exists on the boundary of the color gamut and the edge line from M to R, the position information Pr and Pg is fixed at maximum and minimum, respectively, and Pb is made variable. When the lattice point to be optimized exists on the boundary of the color gamut and the edge line from M to B, the position information Pb and Pg is fixed at maximum and minimum, respectively, and Pr is made variable. When the lattice point to be optimized exists on the boundary of the color gamut and the edge line from C to G, the position information Pg and Pr is fixed at maximum and minimum, respectively, and Pb is made variable. When the lattice point to be optimized exists on the boundary of the color gamut and the edge line from C to B, the position information Pb and Pr is fixed at maximum and minimum, respectively, and Pr is made variable.

When the lattice point to be optimized exists on the boundary of the color gamut and the edge line from Y to R, the position information Pr and Pb is fixed at maximum and minimum, respectively, and Pg is made variable. As mentioned above, the position information to be varied according to the position of the lattice point to be optimized is varied adequately so that the evaluation function is minimized; in this way the position information that minimizes the evaluation function E₁ at that time is calculated and, by repeating this process, it is possible to acquire the vector L′_(p) with the optimized position of lattice point.

(4-2) Evaluation Function E₂

FIG. 9 is a diagram that illustrates the evaluation function to optimize the lattice point on the outer plane formed by the boundary of the color gamut in the Lab color space. In this figure, each broken line is a straight line that connects lattice points with each other. These lattice points exist on the outer plane formed by the boundary of the color gamut, and hence it follows that the other lattice points exist either behind or in front of the paper. The lattice point to be optimized is indicated by the black circle, and its neighboring lattice points are indicated by the white circles. In order to maintain the size of the color gamut, the lattice point to be optimized is not allowed to greatly move in the vertical direction with respect to the outer plane on which the lattice points indicated by the black and white circles exist. So, in this embodiment, when the unit 23 b for extracting objects to be optimized has extracted the lattice point existing on the outer plane formed by the boundary of the color gamut, which is indicated by the black circle in FIG. 9 as the object to be optimized, it extracts as the lattice points for operation four lattice points which are adjacent to the lattice point to be optimized and exist on the outer plane formed by the boundary of the color gamut.

In this figure, the lattice point to be optimized is denoted by the vector L_(p), and the lattice points to be extracted by the unit 23 d for extracting objects for calculation are denoted by the vectors L_(a1) to L_(a4). Here, the vector L_(p) is calculated by the formula (3) above, and it is expressed in terms of the above-mentioned position information (Pr, Pg, Pb) as the variables. The evaluation function to optimize the lattice points existing on the outer plane formed by the boundary of the color gamut utilizes the vector L_(p) and these vectors L_(a1) to L_(a4) and is expressed by the formula (6) shown below. E₂ =|W ₁({right arrow over (L _(a1))}−{right arrow over (L_(p))})+W ₂({right arrow over (L _(a2))}−{right arrow over (L _(p))})|+|W ₃({right arrow over (L _(a3))}−{right arrow over (L _(p))})+W ₄({right arrow over (L _(a4))}−{right arrow over (L _(p))})|  (6) where, W₁ to W₄ are weighting factors.

In other words, if either of W₁ or W₂ in the formula (6) is larger, the state in which the lattice point to be optimized is close to the lattice point at the tip of either vector L_(a1) or vector L_(a2) may be regarded as optimal. Also, if either of W₃ or W₄ is larger, the state in which the lattice point to be optimized is close to the lattice point at the tip of either vector L_(a3) or vector L_(a4) may be regarded as optimal. Incidentally, the factor values of W₁ and W₂ may be determined as in the formula (5) above. W₃ and W₄ may be calculated, as in the formula (5) above, from the ratio of the distance from the RGB lattice point in the color-separating LUT that gives the vector L_(a3) to the RGB lattice point in the color-separating LUT that gives the vector L_(p) to the distance from the RGB lattice point in the color-separating LUT that gives the vector L_(a4) to the intermediate RGB brightness that gives the vector L_(p).

When the line connecting adjacent lattice points is closer to a straight line (the line that passes through the lattice points indicated by vector L_(a1)˜vector L_(p)˜vector L_(a2) in FIG. 9), or when the lattice points are more evenly arranged, the arrangement of lattice points tends to be smoothed; therefore, if W₁=W₂=W₃=W₄, by minimizing E₂ shown in the formula (6), it is possible to acquire the vector L′_(p), with the vector L_(p) optimized for the position of lattice point brought close uniformly, as shown in the right part of FIG. 9. When either of W₁ or W₂ is larger or when either of W₃ or W₄ is larger, the lattice point to be optimized is optimized in the state in which it is close to any adjacent lattice point.

Also, the vector L_(p) and vectors L_(a1)˜L_(a4) are represented by the position information (Pr, Pg, Pb); however, in the evaluation function E₂, the position information that gives the vector L_(p) is the position information (Pr, Pg, Pb), only two of them are variable and other one is fixed at the minimum or maximum value. For example, the color on the outer plane WMBC formed by the boundary of the color gamut indicated by hatched lines in FIG. 7 is the color in the case where the B component is maximum and the R and B components are varied arbitrarily. The position information Pb of the RGB lattice point corresponding to this color is the maximum value and the position information Pr and Pg is the arbitrary value. So, in order to move the lattice point in the Lab color space on the outer plane WMBC, it is only necessary that the position information Pb be fixed at minimum and the Pr and Pg be variable.

This is the same for the other outer plane formed by the boundary of the color gamut. The color on the outer plane MRKB formed by the boundary of the color gamut is the color in the case where the G component is minimum and the R and B components are varied arbitrarily; if the position information Pg is fixed at the minimum value and Pr and Pb are varied, it is possible to move the lattice points to be optimized on the above-mentioned outer plane MRKB. The color on the outer plane RYGK formed by the boundary of the color gamut is the color in the case where the B component is minimum and the R and G components are varied arbitrarily; if the position information Pb is fixed at the minimum value and Pr and Pg are varied, it is possible to move the lattice points to be optimized on the above-mentioned outer plane RYGK.

In addition, the color on the outer plane YWCG formed by the boundary of the color gamut is the color in the case where the G component is maximum and the R and B components are varied arbitrarily; if the position information Pg is fixed at the maximum value and Pr and Pb are varied, it is possible to move the lattice points to be optimized on the above-mentioned outer plane YWCG. The color on the outer plane WYRM formed by the boundary of the color gamut is the color in the case where the R component is maximum and the G and B components are varied arbitrarily; if the position information Pr is fixed at the maximum value and Pg and Pb are varied, it is possible to move the lattice points to be optimized on the above-mentioned outer plane YWRM.

The color on the outer plane CGKB formed by the boundary of the color gamut is the color in the case where the R component is minimum and the G and B components are varied arbitrarily; if the position information Pr is fixed at the minimum value and Pg and Pb are varied, it is possible to move the lattice points to be optimized on the above-mentioned outer plane CGKB. As mentioned above, if the position information that is varied by the position of the lattice point to be optimized is selected and the evaluation function E₂ is minimized, the position information that minimizes the evaluation function at that time is calculated, and by repeating this process it is possible to acquire the vector L′_(p) with the position of the lattice point optimized.

(4-3) Evaluation Function E₃

FIG. 10 is a diagram that illustrates the evaluation function to optimize the lattice point existing inside except for the boundary of the color gamut in the Lab color space. In this figure, each broken line is a straight line that connects a plurality of lattice points with each other. These lattice points exist on the plane which is formed when the color gamut is cut in two directions. The lattice point to be optimized is indicated by the black circle, and its neighboring lattice points are indicated by the white circles. In this embodiment, the lattice points inside the color gamut are moved freely without imposing conditions to maintain the size of the color gamut, and the evenness and nonuniformness of lattice points are controlled by the weighting factor. So, in this embodiment, when the unit 23 b for extracting objects to be optimized has extracted the lattice point existing inside the color gamut, which is indicated by the black circle in FIG. 10 as the object to be optimized, it extracts as the lattice points for operation six lattice points which are adjacent to the lattice point to be optimized in six directions.

In this figure, the lattice point to be optimized is denoted by the vector L_(p), and the lattice points to be extracted by the unit 23 d for extracting objects for calculation are denoted by the vectors L_(a1) to L_(a6). Here, the vector L_(p) is calculated by the formula (3) above, and it is expressed in terms of the above-mentioned position information (Pr, Pg, Pb) as the variables. The evaluation function to optimize the lattice points existing inside the color gamut utilizes the vector L_(p) and these vectors L_(a1) to L_(a6) and is expressed by the formula (7) shown below. E ₃ =|W ₁({right arrow over (L _(a1))}−{right arrow over (L _(p))})+W₂({right arrow over (L _(a2))}−{right arrow over (L _(p))})|+|W ₃({right arrow over (L _(a3))}−{right arrow over (L _(p))})+W ₄({right arrow over (L _(a4))}−{right arrow over (L _(p))})|+|W ₅({right arrow over (L _(a5))}−{right arrow over (L _(p))})+W ₆({right arrow over (L _(a6))}−{right arrow over (L _(p))})|  (7) where, W₁ to W₆ are weighting factors.

In other words, if either of W₁ or W₂ in the formula (7) is larger, the state in which. the lattice point to be optimized is close to the lattice point at the tip of either vector L_(a1) or vector L_(a2) may be regarded as optimal. Also, if either of W₃ or W₄ is larger, the state in which the lattice point to be optimized is close to the lattice point at the tip of either vector L_(a3) or vector L_(a4) may be regarded as optimal. Further, if either of W₅ or W₆ is larger, the state in which the lattice point to be optimized is close to the lattice point at the tip of either vector L_(a5) or vector L_(a6) may be regarded as optimal.

Incidentally, the factor values of W₁ to W₄ may be determined as in the formula (5) above. W₅ and W₆ may be calculated from the ratio of the distance from the RGB lattice point in the color-separating LUT that gives the vector La₅ to the RGB lattice point in the color-separating LUT that gives the vector L_(p) to the distance from the RGB lattice point in the color-separating LUT that gives the vector L_(a6) to the RGB lattice point in the color-separating LUT that gives the vector L_(p).

When the line connecting adjacent lattice points is closer to a straight line (the line that passes through the lattice points indicated by vector L_(a1)˜vector L_(p)˜vector L_(a2) in FIG. 10), or when the lattice points are more evenly arranged, the arrangement of lattice points tends to be smoothed; therefore, if W₁=W₂=W₃=W₄=W₅=W₆, by minimizing E₃ shown in the formula (7), it is possible to acquire the vector L′_(p), with the vector L_(p) optimized for the position of lattice point brought close uniformly, as shown in the right part of FIG. 10. When either of W₁ or W₂ is larger or when either of W₃ or W₄ is larger or when either of W₅ or W₆ is larger, the lattice point to be optimized is optimized in the state in which it is close to any adjacent lattice point.

Also, the vector L_(p) and vectors L_(a1)˜L_(a6) are represented by the position information (Pr, Pg, Pb) and the position information (Pr, Pg, Pb) that gives the vector L_(p) in the evaluation function E₃ is all variable. As mentioned above, if the position vector is varied and the evaluation function E₃ is minimized, it is possible to calculate the position information that minimizes the evaluation function at that time and, by repeating this process, it is possible to acquire the vector L′_(p), with the position of lattice point optimized.

(5) Another Embodiment

The above-mentioned embodiment is merely one example, and it is possible to accept other constitutions so long as they permit accurate color conversion by performing the smoothing process. FIG. 11 is a block diagram of the constitution in which the smoothing process according to the present invention is applied to the apparatus that carries out printing by using the profile prescribed by the ICC profile. In this figure, the same symbols are used for the same constitution in FIG. 4. In the ICC profile, it is necessary to previously get ready the source profile that transforms the color component values to be used by the image input device (such as display) into the coordinate values (such as Lab values) in the device-independent color space and the media profile that transforms the coordinate values in the device-independent color space into the color component values to be used by the image output device (such as printer).

And, it references the source profile, thereby converting the color defined by the input image data once into the coordinate values in the device-independent color space, and then references the media profile, thereby converting the coordinate values in the device-independent color space into the color component values to be used by the printer. The color component value references the no color adjustment LUT, thereby converting the color defined by the input image data into the color component value to be used by the printer. In this way, it is possible to execute printing with accurate conversion of image data color. Incidentally, in this embodiment, the media profile is prepared such that the color defined by the input image data agrees with the color defined by the color component value to be used by the printer.

To be concrete, the first step is to previously record in the hard disc 13 b the source profile 411 and the color-separating LUT 43. The no color adjustment LUT 42 and the media profile 410 are prepared from the color-separating LUT 43. In other words, the module 23 for smoothing process, like the module shown in FIG. 4, performs smoothing process by referencing the color-separating LUT 43 and prepares the no color adjustment LUT 42. The media profile generating module 220 generates the media profile 410 by Lab→RGB conversion from color measurement shown in FIG. 1 on the basis of the no color adjustment LUT 42, the calorimetric value output by the calorimeter 50, and the Lab value output by the module 21 for determining the target Lab value. As the result, when the output RGB of the media profile 410 is converted by the no color adjustment LUT 42, it is possible to acquire the CMYKlclm data equivalent to the color defined by the Lab value entered into the media profile 410.

In the embodiment shown in FIG. 11, the printer driver 12 c has the module for color binding 321 and the module for color correction 322. These modules 321 and 322 convert the color of the input image into the CMYKlclm data corresponding to the ink color to be used by the printer. The module for color binding 321 is a module which references the source profile 411 and the media profile 410, thereby converting the RGB colors of the input image data into the RGB values in the RGB color system which is prescribed in the no color adjustment LUT 42.

In other words, the source profile 411 is a profile which converts the color system of the input image data into the Lab color system; the module for color binding 321 references the source profile 411 to represent the color of input image data in terms of Lab values. The media profile 410 is a profile which converts the Lab color system into the RGB value in the RGB color system prescribed in the no color adjustment LUT 42. The module for color binding 321 references the media profile 410, thereby converting the Lab value into the RGB value. This RGB value is entered into the module for color correction 322.

The module for color correction 322 is a module which references the LUT, thereby performing color conversion. It references the no color adjustment LUT 42, thereby converging the RGB value entered into the CMYKlclm data. The thus obtained CMYKlclm data is entered into the halftoning module 33 and the printing module 34, so that the printer 17 c prints the image defined by the image data. The media profile 410 is prepared from the no color adjustment LUT 42 after smoothing process as mentioned above. Even in this case, when the media profile 410 is prepared, interpolation is carried out as in the first embodiment mentioned above. Therefore, by smoothing the color-separating LUT 43, it is possible to improve the accuracy of interpolation, to particularly and locally improve the accuracy of interpolation according to need, and to prevent inaccurate operation from occurring locally due to ink properties at the time of interpolation. Therefore, in this embodiment, too, it is possible to execute printing by performing accurate color conversion.

Incidentally, in the above-mentioned two embodiments, the same PC functions as a printer driver (or a print-controlling apparatus) and also as an apparatus to prepare the LUT. Of course, it is possible to use separate PCs for these functions. In other words, if the color-correcting LUT, the media profile, and the no color adjustment LUT are previously prepared by using a PC capable of executing the unit for preparing the LUT, and the color-correcting LUT, the media profile, and the no color adjustment LUT which are thus prepared are transferred to another PC capable of controlling the printer by means of the printer driver, it is possible to realize each of them by individual PCs.

Also, in the above-mentioned printer 17 c it was possible to mount six color inks of CMYKlclm; however, it is permissible to increase the number of colors by adding DY (dark yellow) or to decrease the number of colors by omitting lclm. It is also possible to mount six color inks of CMYKRV by using other colors, for example, R (red) and V (violet).

Moreover, in the above-mentioned evaluation function, it is permissible to adopt a function that increases in value when the degree of smoothness of the arrangement of lattice points in the virtual Lab color space decreases, and various functions other than mentioned above can be adopted. For example, in the above-mentioned evaluation functions E₂ and E₃, only the lattice points for which the vector is orthogonal when the lattice point forms the cubic lattice are extracted as the neighboring lattice points to be optimized. Selection in this manner is not always essential. For example, the evaluation function may be the one which includes the lattice point at the orthogonal position when the lattice points like vectors L_(a5) and L_(a6) in FIG. 9 form the cubic lattice. Such a lattice point at the orthogonal position is at the orthogonal position also in the RGB space, and particularly, the orthogonal axis of R=G=B corresponds to the gray axis. Therefore, if the degree of smoothness of the arrangement increases also for the lattice point at the orthogonal position, it is possible to prevent the occurrence of tone jump at the time of monochrome output.

In addition, in the above-mentioned embodiments, the sum of vectors in the opposite directions is taken so that the evaluation function has a small value for the arrangement of lattice points with a high degree of smoothness. Of course, other constitutions may be adopted. For example it may be a function which evaluates whether or not the relative positional relation between lattice points is similar. To be concrete, if a difference between vector L_(a5)−vector L_(a4) and vector L_(a1)−vector L_(p) in FIG. 9 is taken, the difference vector of the two vectors or (vector L_(a5)−vector L_(a4))−(vector L_(a1)−vector L_(p)) is obtained. It can be said that the smaller the difference vector, the more similar the relative positional relation between the lattice points. Therefore, by adding the difference between (vector L_(a1)−vector L_(p)) and the neighboring vectors, it is possible to acquire the evaluation function that evaluates the degree of smoothness of the arrangement.

Moreover, in the above-mentioned embodiments, the smoothing of the arrangement of lattice point to be optimized is accomplished by extracting the separate neighboring lattice points for each region in the virtual Lab color space and consequently there is no relation among the respective lattice points to be optimized by each of evaluation function E₁ to evaluation function E₃. So, it is acceptable to perform operation with weighting such that the degree of smoothness of the arrangement increases at the boundary of each region, too, by optimizing the lattice point by individual evaluation functions for each region.

In the above-mentioned evaluation functions E₁ and E₂, any one or two of the position information (Pr, Pg, Pb) is fixed; however, in the evaluation function E₃, all three of the position information (Pr, Pg, Pb) are variable, and hence the constraint condition rapidly changes in the vicinity of the boundary of the color gamut. Also, the restraint condition rapidly changes on the edge line and outer plane that form the boundary of the color gamut even between the boundary of the color gamut. As the constraint condition changes rapidly, the degree of freedom in moving lattice points to smooth the arrangement of lattice points and the degree of freedom in the moving direction are entirely different. In such a case, there is the possibility that discontinuity occurs in the degree of smoothness of the arrangement of lattice points. So, in order to prevent the constraint condition from changing rapidly, the evaluation function is given a term which is weighted such that the position information hardly fluctuates.

If it is assumed that the range of values of RGB data in the color-separating LUT is 0˜255, then it can be said that the farther each color component of RGB data is from the middle point of the value range, the closer the virtual Lab lattice point is to the boundary of the color gamut. Therefore, for the R component, it is possible to judge whether or not it is close to the boundary of the color gamut in terms of the absolute value |R−127.5|. So, by considering other color components in the same way, weight corresponding to the degree of closeness to the boundary of the color gamut is defined by the formula (8) below.

$\begin{matrix} \left\{ \begin{matrix} {{Wr} = {k_{wr}\left( \frac{\left| {R - 127.5} \right|}{127.5} \right)}^{\gamma_{wr}}} \\ {{Wg} = {k_{wg}\left( \frac{\left| {G - 127.5} \right|}{127.5} \right)}^{\gamma_{wg}}} \\ {{W\; b} = {k_{wb}\left( \frac{\left| {B - 127.5} \right|}{127.5} \right)}^{\gamma_{wb}}} \end{matrix} \right. & (8) \end{matrix}$

Incidentally, Wr, Wg, and W_(b) denote respectively the weight which varies Pr, Pg, and Pb. And, k_(wr), k_(wg), and k_(wb) denote respectively the factor that determines the magnitude of each weight. They should be sufficiently large so that each position information does not fluctuate at the boundary of the color gamut. γ_(wr), γ_(wg), and γ_(wb) denote respectively the factors that adjust the degree of change of the magnitude of weight. By adjusting these factors, it is possible to change the weight according to the RGB data in the color-separating LUT. They enable sufficient optimization without excessive weight in the vicinity of the center of the color gamut.

Here, the above-mentioned evaluation function E₁ will be described in detail with reference to a concrete example in consideration of the edge of the boundary of the color gamut in the case where only Pr (as the position information) is variable. The formula (9) below is the evaluation function E₁ to which the above-mentioned weight W_(r) is added. E ₁ =| _(1W)({right arrow over (L _(a1))}−{right arrow over (L _(p))})+W ₂({right arrow over (L _(a2))}−{right arrow over (L _(p))})|+Wr(Pr ₀ −Pr)²  (9) The second term in this formula is the term added so that the position information Pr becomes harder to change as it approaches the boundary of the color gamut (the end of the edge line formed on the boundary of the color gamut in this case). P_(r0) denotes the present position information in the R direction.

In other words, the closer the second term in the above formula is to the boundary of the color gamut, the larger is the value of the weighting factor W_(r), and the farther the position information P_(r) is from the present position P_(r0), the larger is the second term. Therefore, in the optimizing process to minimize the evaluation function E₁, the position information P_(r) and P_(r0) become close values and both position information take close values as they are close to the boundary of the color gamut. Incidentally, even in the case where only the position information Pg is variable or only the position information Pb is variable, the second term can be added to the evaluation function E₁ based on the same idea. Of course, the evaluation function E₂ and the evaluation function E₃ may be the same; in the evaluation function E₂, two components of the position information are variable and hence two terms are added to the evaluation function; in the evaluation function E3, three components of the position information are variable and hence three terms are added to the evaluation function.

Although the present invention has been described and illustrated in detail, it is clearly understood that the same is by way illustration and example only and is not to be taken by way of limitation, the spirit and scope of the present invention being limited only by the terms of the appended claims. 

1. A method for determining lattice points to be referenced to prepare correspondence defining data that defines correspondence between the amount of each ink used by the printing apparatus and the color component value in a color system, said method comprising: referencing the original correspondence defining data which previously prescribes correspondence between the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space prescribed by less color components than the number of inks and the lattice points for ink amount in the ink amount space, thereby acquiring correspondence between the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space and the lattice points in the device-independent color space; prescribing a smoothness evaluation function which evaluates the smoothness of arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color space and contains a constraint condition that the arrangement of lattice points becomes nonuniform at a certain position in the device-independent color space and which has as a variable the lattice point position information in the low-dimensional color space; optimizing the arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color-space by improving the rating of the smoothness evaluation function, with the lattice point position information in the low-dimensional color space varied; and referencing the original correspondence defining data, thereby associating the amount of each ink corresponding to the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space in the optimized state with the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space prescribed by the original correspondence defining data.
 2. The method for determining lattice points to be referenced to prepare the correspondence defining data as defined in claim 1, wherein the smoothness evaluation function is a function which contains the absolute value of the sum of the terms multiplied by a different weighting factor for each of the vectors which are oriented toward the adjacent lattice points adjacent to the lattice point to be optimized and which are also oriented in the mutually opposite directions.
 3. The method for determining lattice points to be referenced to prepare the correspondence defining data as defined in claim 1, wherein said weighting factors are values varying for each region in the color gamut to which the lattice point to be optimized belongs.
 4. The method for determining lattice points to be referenced to prepare the correspondence defining data as defined in claim 2, wherein the weighting factor to be multiplied to one of the vectors is smaller than the weighting factor to be multiplied to the other vector when one of the vectors is larger than the other vector.
 5. The method for determining lattice points to be referenced to prepare the correspondence defining data as defined in claim 2, wherein the weighting factor to be multiplied to each vector in the opposite direction is inversely proportional to the distance between the low-dimensional color lattice points corresponding to the end points of each vector.
 6. An apparatus for determining lattice points to be referenced to prepare correspondence defining data that defines correspondence between the amount of each ink used by the printing apparatus and the color component value in a color system, said apparatus comprising: a unit to record the original correspondence defining data which previously prescribes correspondence between the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space prescribed by less color components than the number of inks and the lattice points for ink amount in the ink amount space; a unit to acquire correspondence between the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space and the lattice points in the device-independent color space by referencing the original correspondence defining data; a unit to calculate a smoothness evaluation function which evaluates the smoothness of arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color space and contains a constraint condition that the arrangement of lattice points becomes nonuniform at a certain position in the device-independent color space and which has as a variable the lattice point position information in the low-dimensional color space; a unit to optimize the arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color-space by improving the rating of the smoothness evaluation function, with the lattice point position information in the low-dimensional color space varied; and a unit to reference the original correspondence defining data, thereby associating the amount of each ink corresponding to the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space in the optimized state with the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space prescribed by the original correspondence defining data.
 7. A computer-readable medium encoded with a computer executable program or instructions which enables the computer to realize the capability of determining lattice points to be referenced to prepare correspondence defining data that defines correspondence between an amount of each ink used by a printing apparatus and a color component value in a color system, said computer-executable program or instructions comprising: a feature to record in a prescribed recording medium the original correspondence defining data which previously prescribes correspondence between the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space prescribed by less color components than the number of inks and the lattice points for ink amount in the ink amount space and to acquire correspondence between the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space and the lattice points in the device-independent color space by referencing the original correspondence defining data; a feature to calculate a smoothness evaluation function which evaluates the smoothness of arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color space and contains a constraint condition that the arrangement of lattice points becomes nonuniform at a certain position in the device-independent color space and which has as a variable the lattice point position information in the low-dimensional color space; a feature to optimize the arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color-space by improving the rating of the smoothness evaluation function, with the lattice point position information in the low-dimensional color space varied; and a feature to reference the original correspondence defining data, thereby associating the amount of each ink corresponding to the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space in the optimized state with the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space prescribed by the original correspondence defining data.
 8. A print controlling apparatus for generating the printing data which permit printing by referencing correspondence defining data that defines correspondence between the amount of each ink used by the printing apparatus and the color component value in a color system and converting the color component value in the color system into the amount of ink, which is characterized in that: the correspondence defining data is one which is prepared by referencing the original correspondence defining data which previously prescribes correspondence between the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space prescribed by less color components than the number of inks and the lattice points for ink amount in the ink amount space, thereby acquiring correspondence between the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space and the lattice points in the device-independent color space, prescribing a smoothness evaluation function which evaluates the smoothness of arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color space and contains a constraint condition that the arrangement of lattice points becomes nonuniform at a certain position in the device-independent color space and which has as a variable the lattice point position information in the low-dimensional color space, optimizing the arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color-space by improving the rating of the smoothness evaluation function, with the lattice point position information in the low-dimensional color space varied, referencing the original correspondence defining data, thereby associating the amount of each ink corresponding to the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space in the optimized state with the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space prescribed by the original correspondence defining data to establish the lattice points for preparing the correspondence defining data, and associating the amount of ink with the color component value in the other color system by means of the calorimetric value measured by using a prescribed colorimetry for the result of printing with the amount of ink prescribed by the lattice points to be referenced to prepare the correspondence defining data.
 9. A print controlling method for generating the printing data which permit printing by referencing correspondence defining data that defines correspondence between the amount of each ink used by the printing apparatus and the color component value in a color system and converting the color component value in the color system into the amount of ink, which is characterized in that: the correspondence defining data is one which is prepared by referencing the original correspondence defining data which previously prescribes correspondence between the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space prescribed by less color components than the number of inks and the lattice points for ink amount in the ink amount space, thereby acquiring correspondence between the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space and the lattice points in the device-independent color space, prescribing a smoothness evaluation function which evaluates the smoothness of arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color space and contains a constraint condition that the arrangement of lattice points becomes nonuniform at a certain position in the device-independent color space and which has as a variable the lattice point position information in the low-dimensional color space, optimizing the arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color-space by improving the rating of the smoothness evaluation function, with the lattice point position information in the low-dimensional color space varied, referencing the original correspondence defining data, thereby associating the amount of each ink corresponding to the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space in the optimized state with the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space prescribed by the original correspondence defining data to establish the lattice points for preparing the correspondence defining data, and associating the amount of ink with the color component value in the other color system by means of the calorimetric value measured by using a prescribed colorimetry for the result of printing with the amount of ink prescribed by the lattice points to be referenced to prepare the correspondence defining data.
 10. A computer-readable medium encoded with a computer executable print controlling program or instructions which enables the computer to realize the capability of generating printing data which permits printing by referencing correspondence defining data that defines correspondence between an amount of each ink used by a printing apparatus and a color component value in a color system and converting the color component value in the color system into an amount of ink, which is characterized in that: the correspondence defining data is one which is prepared by referencing the original correspondence defining data which previously prescribes correspondence between the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space prescribed by less color components than the number of inks and the lattice points for ink amount in the ink amount space, thereby acquiring correspondence between the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space and the lattice points in the device-independent color space, prescribing a smoothness evaluation function which evaluates the smoothness of arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color space and contains a constraint condition that the arrangement of lattice points becomes nonuniform at a certain position in the device-independent color space and which has as a variable the lattice point position information in the low-dimensional color space, optimizing the arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color-space by improving the rating of the smoothness evaluation function, with the lattice point position information in the low-dimensional color space varied, referencing the original correspondence defining data, thereby associating the amount of each ink corresponding to the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space in the optimized state with the lattice points in the low-dimensional color, space prescribed by the original correspondence defining data to establish the lattice points for preparing the correspondence defining data, and associating.
 11. A color converting apparatus which references correspondence defining data that defines correspondence between the amount of each ink used by the printing apparatus and the color component value in a color system, thereby converting the color component value in the color system into the amount of ink, which is characterized in that: the correspondence defining data is one which is prepared by referencing the original correspondence defining data which previously prescribes correspondence between the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space prescribed by less color components than the number of inks and the lattice points for ink amount in the ink amount space, thereby acquiring correspondence between the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space and the lattice points in the device-independent color space, prescribing a smoothness evaluation function which evaluates the smoothness of arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color space and contains a constraint condition that the arrangement of lattice points becomes nonuniform at a certain position in the device-independent color space and which has as a variable the lattice point position information in the low-dimensional color space, optimizing the arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color-space by improving the rating of the smoothness evaluation function, with the lattice point position information in the low-dimensional color space varied, referencing the original correspondence defining data, thereby associating the amount of each ink corresponding to the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space in the optimized state with the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space prescribed by the original correspondence defining data to establish the lattice points for preparing the correspondence defining data, and associating the amount of ink with the color component value in the other color system by means of the calorimetric value measured by using a prescribed colorimetry for the result of printing with the amount of ink prescribed by the lattice points to be referenced to prepare the correspondence defining data.
 12. A color converting method which references correspondence defining data that defines correspondence between the amount of each ink used by the printing apparatus and the color component value in a color system, thereby converting the color component value in the color system into the amount of ink, which is characterized in that: the correspondence defining data is one which is prepared by referencing the original correspondence defining data which previously prescribes correspondence between the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space prescribed by less color components than the number of inks and the lattice points for ink amount in the ink amount space, thereby acquiring correspondence between the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space and the lattice points in the device-independent color space, prescribing a smoothness evaluation function which evaluates the smoothness of arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color space and contains a constraint condition that the arrangement of lattice points becomes nonuniform at a certain position in the device-independent color space and which has as a variable the lattice point position information in the low-dimensional color space, optimizing the arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color-space by improving the rating of the smoothness evaluation function, with the lattice point position information in the low-dimensional color space varied, referencing the original correspondence defining data, thereby associating the amount of each ink corresponding to the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space in the optimized state with the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space prescribed by the original correspondence defining data to establish the lattice points for preparing the correspondence defining data, and associating the amount of ink with the color component value in the other color system by means of the calorimetric value measured by using a prescribed colorimetry for the result of printing with the amount of ink prescribed by the lattice points to be referenced to prepare the correspondence defining data.
 13. A computer-readable medium encoded with a computer executable color converting program or instructions which references correspondence defining data that defines correspondence between an amount of each ink used by a printing apparatus and a color component value in a color system, thereby converting the color component value in the color system into an amount of ink, which is characterized in that: the correspondence defining data is one which is prepared by referencing the original correspondence defining data which previously prescribes correspondence between the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space prescribed by less color components than the number of inks and the lattice points for ink amount in the ink amount space, thereby acquiring correspondence between the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space and the lattice points in the device-independent color space, prescribing a smoothness evaluation function which evaluates the smoothness of arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color space and contains a constraint condition that the arrangement of lattice points becomes nonuniform at a certain position in the device-independent color space and which has as a variable the lattice point position information in the low-dimensional color space, optimizing the arrangement of lattice points in the device-independent color-space by improving the rating of the smoothness evaluation function, with the lattice point position information in the low-dimensional color space varied, referencing the original correspondence defining data, thereby associating the amount of each ink corresponding to the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space in the optimized state with the lattice points in the low-dimensional color space prescribed by the original correspondence defining data to establish the lattice points for preparing the correspondence defining data, and associating the amount of ink with the color component value in the other color system by means of the colorimetric value measured by using a prescribed colorimetry for the result of printing with the amount of ink prescribed by the lattice points to be referenced to prepare the correspondence defining data. 